Broad Detection of Alterations Predicted to Confer Lack of Benefit From EGFR Antibodies or Sensitivity to Targeted Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION A KRAS mutation represented the first genomic biomarker to predict lack of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded RAS testing has further refined the treatment approach, but understanding of genomic alterations underlying primary and acquired resistance is limited and further study is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively analyzed 4,422 clinical samples from patients with advanced CRC, using hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at the request of the individual treating physicians. Comparison with prior molecular testing results, when available, was performed to assess concordance. RESULTS We identified a RAS/RAF pathway mutation or amplification in 62% of cases, including samples harboring KRAS mutations outside of the codon 12/13 hotspot region in 6.4% of cases. Among cases with KRAS non-codon 12/13 alterations for which prior test results were available, 79 of 90 (88%) were not identified by focused testing. Of 1,644 RAS/RAF wild-type cases analyzed by CGP, 31% harbored a genomic alteration (GA) associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC including mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, EGFR, and ERBB2. We also identified other targetable GA, including novel kinase fusions, receptor tyrosine kinase amplification, activating point mutations, as well as microsatellite instability. CONCLUSION Extended genomic profiling reliably detects alterations associated with lack of benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC, while simultaneously identifying alterations potentially important in guiding treatment. The use of CGP during the course of clinical care allows for the refined selection of appropriate targeted therapies and clinical trials, increasing the chance of clinical benefit and avoiding therapeutic futility. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) detects diverse genomic alterations associated with lack of benefit to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as targetable alterations in many other genes. This includes detection of a broad spectrum of activating KRAS alterations frequently missed by focused molecular hotspot testing, as well as other RAS/RAF pathway alterations, mutations shown to disrupt antibody binding, RTK activating point mutations, amplifications, and rearrangements, and activating alterations in downstream effectors including PI3K and MEK1. The use of CGP in clinical practice is critical to guide appropriate selection of targeted therapies for patients with advanced CRC.

[1]  M. Berger,et al.  Reliable Detection of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Colorectal Cancers Using Mutational Load in Next-Generation Sequencing Panels. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Extended RAS Gene Mutation Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to Predict Response to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion Update 2015. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  P. Stephens,et al.  BRAFV600E Mutations in High-Grade Colorectal Neuroendocrine Tumors May Predict Responsiveness to BRAF-MEK Combination Therapy. , 2016, Cancer discovery.

[4]  James X. Sun,et al.  Oncogenic ALK Fusion in Rare and Aggressive Subtype of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma as a Potential Therapeutic Target , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  A. Bardelli,et al.  MM-151 overcomes acquired resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancers harboring EGFR extracellular domain mutations , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  James X. Sun,et al.  Evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) status in gastrointestinal (GI) tumor samples tested with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). , 2016 .

[7]  E. Perez,et al.  Targeted therapy for gastrointestinaI (GI) tumors based on molecular profiles: Early results from MyPathway, an open-label phase IIa basket study in patients with advanced solid tumors. , 2016 .

[8]  Mari Mino-Kenudson,et al.  Tumor Heterogeneity and Lesion-Specific Response to Targeted Therapy in Colorectal Cancer. , 2016, Cancer discovery.

[9]  Gang Li,et al.  Acquired Resistance to the TRK Inhibitor Entrectinib in Colorectal Cancer. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[10]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  L. Borsu,et al.  Identification of Targetable Kinase Alterations in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma That are Preferentially Associated with Wild-Type RAS/RAF , 2015, Molecular Cancer Research.

[12]  G. Fontanini,et al.  FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  R. Scharpf,et al.  The Genomic Landscape of Response to EGFR Blockade in Colorectal Cancer , 2015, Nature.

[14]  Ron Bose,et al.  HER2 activating mutations are targets for colorectal cancer treatment. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[15]  P. Stephens,et al.  Durable clinical benefit to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma harboring ERBB2 amplification , 2015, Oncoscience.

[16]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  A. Bertotti,et al.  Molecular Pathways: Sensitivity and Resistance to Anti-EGFR Antibodies , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  Beatriz Bellosillo,et al.  Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[19]  P. Stephens,et al.  Identification and characterization of RET fusions in advanced colorectal cancer , 2015, Oncotarget.

[20]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  Clinical Acquired Resistance to RAF Inhibitor Combinations in BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer through MAPK Pathway Alterations. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[21]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation mediates cross-resistance to panitumumab and cetuximab in gastrointestinal cancer , 2015, Oncotarget.

[22]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics, 2012 , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[23]  R. Moreira,et al.  Clinical Response to Sorafenib in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and FLT3 Amplification , 2015, Case reports in oncology.

[24]  M. Salido,et al.  Emergence of Multiple EGFR Extracellular Mutations during Cetuximab Treatment in Colorectal Cancer , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  F. Loupakis,et al.  FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: from heterogeneity to convergent evolution. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[27]  Hartmut Link,et al.  FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[28]  P. Scheet,et al.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and gene expression analyses of non-KRAS 12/13, RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[29]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  Mef Nilbert,et al.  The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, Acta oncologica.

[31]  D. Carraro,et al.  KRAS insertions in colorectal cancer: what do we know about unusual KRAS mutations? , 2014, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[32]  S. Ng,et al.  Characterization of rare transforming KRAS mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer , 2014, Cancer biology & therapy.

[33]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  G. Troncone,et al.  KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: challenges, controversies, breakthroughs and beyond , 2013, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[36]  I. Nagtegaal,et al.  KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR‐targeted therapy , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[37]  Andrea Bertotti,et al.  Amplification of the MET receptor drives resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[38]  Jeffrey J Meyer,et al.  Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012. (5) , 2013 .

[39]  J. Pagès,et al.  Effect of low-frequency KRAS mutations on the response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[40]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer , 2012, Nature.

[41]  F. Bosch,et al.  Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[42]  P. Jänne,et al.  Activation of ERBB2 Signaling Causes Resistance to the EGFR-Directed Therapeutic Antibody Cetuximab , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[43]  C. Bokemeyer,et al.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[44]  J. Ross Biomarker-based selection of therapy for colorectal cancer. , 2011, Biomarkers in medicine.

[45]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN mutations: implications for targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[46]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  Matej Horvat,et al.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer , 2011, Radiology and oncology.

[48]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[49]  Barry S Taylor,et al.  Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. , 2010, Cancer research.

[50]  J. Reid,et al.  Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  G. Fontanini,et al.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[52]  Francesca Molinari,et al.  PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. , 2009, Cancer research.

[53]  S. Andreola,et al.  PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[54]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  J. Stachura,et al.  KRAS mutation profile in colorectal carcinoma and novel mutation--internal tandem duplication in KRAS. , 2008, Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists.

[57]  D. Barford,et al.  Mechanism of Activation of the RAF-ERK Signaling Pathway by Oncogenic Mutations of B-RAF , 2004, Cell.

[58]  F. McCormick,et al.  Biochemical Characterization of a Novel KRAS Insertion Mutation from a Human Leukemia* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.