Communication, Procedural Justice, and Employee Attitudes: Relationships Under Conditions of Divestiture

This study examines the relationships among managerial communication, perceptions of the procedural justice of layoffs, and employee attitudes within the context of divestiture. As we expected, employee perceptions of procedural justice regarding the divestiture predicted, at one point in time, trust in new ownership and, two months later, post-divestiture commitment to the organization. Also as hypothesized, perceptions of the justice of the divestiture explained variance in trust and commitment above and beyond that explained by the perceived justice of the layoffs. Finally, as predicted, managerial communications that helped employees understand the events surrounding the divestiture increased perceptions of the procedural justice of the divestiture and layoffs, and had both indirect and direct effects on future commitment.

[1]  J. Greenberg Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts , 1990 .

[2]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Layoffs, Job Insecurity, And Survivors' Work Effort: Evidence Of An Inverted-U Relationship , 1992 .

[3]  B. Bass,et al.  Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership , 1993 .

[4]  S. Freud The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud , 1953 .

[5]  S. Grover,et al.  Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies. , 1991 .

[6]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Research methods in human resources management , 1991 .

[7]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[8]  R. MacCallum,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS , 1986 .

[9]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Equity and Justice in Social Behavior , 1982 .

[10]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation , 1996 .

[11]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Approaching Equity and Avoiding Inequity in Groups and Organizations , 1982 .

[12]  D. Paulhus Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[13]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. , 1991, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[14]  J. Greenberg,et al.  A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories , 1987 .

[15]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. , 1988 .

[16]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[17]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  Assessing the Non-Random Sampling Effects of Subject Attrition in Longitudinal Research , 1996 .

[18]  J. Weston,et al.  Takeover and Corporate Restructuring: An Overview , 1990 .

[19]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Basic group processes , 1983 .

[20]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. , 1993 .

[21]  J. Meindl,et al.  Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. , 1984 .

[22]  Sara M. Freedman,et al.  An Integrative Model of Managerial Reward Allocation , 1980 .

[23]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[24]  A. Kinicki,et al.  Developing and testing a model of survivor responses to layoffs , 1991 .

[25]  John H. Grant,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING DIVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD STUDY , 1982 .

[26]  A. Denisi,et al.  Communication with Employees Following a Merger: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1991 .

[27]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[28]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[29]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[30]  Janet Taylor Spence,et al.  Contemporary topics in social psychology , 1976 .

[31]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  J. Giacobbe-Miller,et al.  A TEST OF THE GROUP VALUES AND CONTROL MODELS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE FROM THE COMPETING PERSPECTIVES OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENT , 1995 .

[33]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Procedural Justice and Survivors Reactions to Job Layoffs , 1995 .

[34]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? , 1987 .

[35]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations , 1983 .

[36]  Stephen A. Stumpf,et al.  Learning Style Theory: Less than Meets the Eye , 1980 .

[37]  Thomas E. Becker Foci and Bases of Commitment: Are They Distinctions Worth Making? , 1992 .

[38]  R. Bies,et al.  The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. , 1987 .

[39]  Robert Folger,et al.  The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims' layoff reactions. , 1991 .

[40]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[41]  Daniel M. Eveleth,et al.  Foci And Bases Of Employee Commitment: Implications For Job Performance , 1996 .

[42]  S. Juni Conceptualizing Defense Mechanisms from Drive Theory and Object Relations Perspectives , 1997, American journal of psychoanalysis.

[43]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[44]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[45]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[46]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[47]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Interactive Effects of Procedural Justice and Outcome Negativity on Victims and Survivors of Job Loss , 1994 .