AFTER EXCELLENCE: MODELS OF ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Abstract: Organisational culture is recognised as a critical ingredient of organisational effectiveness. However, the popular “excellence” model of managing organisational culture is unsuited to the contingencies and character of many public sector organisations. Termed here the cultural control model, it is the only widely shared understanding of good culture and haw to create it. As a generic prototype of culture it is limited, since it relies on management imposing a culture on a work force devoid of subcultural conflict. Three other models of organisational culture are introduced which offer more promise for the public sector: the subcultural model; the professional-managerial multiculture; and the public service or public interest model. These other models recognise in the culture-building strategies they prescribe that culture is deeply-rooted and not readily malleable by management and that subcultures affect organisations in various, not necessarily negative, ways. While the cultural control model reminds us of the significance of culture to better management, subsequent research has refined models of organisational culture which are more Consistent with the values and ethics of professionalism and good administration.

[1]  Joanne D. Martin,et al.  Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. , 1983 .

[2]  Kathleen L. Gregory,et al.  Native-view paradigms: Multiple cultures and culture conflicts in organizations. , 1983 .

[3]  E. Schein The Role of the Founder in Creating Organizational Culture , 1983 .

[4]  Alan L. Wilkins,et al.  Efficient Cultures: Exploring the Relationship between Culture and Organizational Performance. , 1983 .

[5]  A. Pettigrew Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[6]  C. Cherniss,et al.  Public Sector Professionals: Job Characteristics, Satisfaction, and Aspirations for Intrinsic Fulfillment through Work , 1987 .

[7]  P. D. Anthony The Paradox of the Management of Culture or ″He Who Leads is Lost″ , 1990 .

[8]  Randall A. Rose Organizations as Multiple Cultures: A Rules Theory Analysis , 1988 .

[9]  Robert A. Ullrich,et al.  A Comparison of Managers Entering or Reentering The Profit and Nonprofit Sectors , 1975 .

[10]  J. Stewart,et al.  THE PUBLIC SERVICE ORIENTATION: ISSUES AND DILEMMAS , 1987 .

[11]  H. Schwartz Anti-social Actions of Committed Organizational Participants: An Existential Psychoanalytic Perspective , 1987 .

[12]  L. Smircich Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[13]  R. Lachman,et al.  PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR DIFFERENCES: CEOS' PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR ROLE ENVIRONMENTS , 1985 .

[14]  Paul R. Mico,et al.  Domain Theory: An Introduction to Oganizational Behavior in Human Service Organizations , 1979 .

[15]  T. H. Fitzgerald,et al.  Can change in organizational culture really be managed , 1988 .

[16]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Strategic Decision Making: Influence Patterns in Public and Private Sector Organizations , 1987 .

[17]  Robert W. Backoff,et al.  Comparing Public and Private Organizations , 1976 .

[18]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy , 1988 .

[19]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[20]  Abraham Zaleznik The mythological structure of organizations and its impact , 1989 .

[21]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategic Management and Determinism , 1984 .

[22]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT , 1989 .

[23]  Bruce Buchanan,et al.  Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment , 1974 .