Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 normal participants while they completed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Previous ERP studies have implicated the N2 and P3 waveforms as the main indices of processing in this task, and functional brain imaging has shown parietal, prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices to be involved in response inhibition. 32-channel ERP analysis revealed amplitude differences in the N2/P3 components when stimuli that required a button-press (Go stimuli) were compared with stimuli for which the response had to be withheld (No-Go stimuli), and in N2 and P3 latencies when successful withholds to No-Go stimuli were compared with unsuccessful attempts to inhibit. Further differences in the N2/P3 complex emerged when participants were grouped in terms of a measure of absentmindedness (the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, CFQ); larger and earlier components were found for high CFQ respondents. We conclude that the latencies of the N2 and P3 may be the critical indicators of active inhibitory processes for this task, suggesting that a pattern of sequential activation rather than altered activity level in key structures may mediate success on the task. In addition, highly absentminded participants exhibited larger components for errors than did less absentminded participants when performing at the same level, which implies that the absentminded may require greater activity in the neural substrates of response inhibition in order to accomplish this task at a comparable level of performance to less absentminded participants.

[1]  D. Broadbent,et al.  The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. , 1982, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[2]  D. V. Ent Perceptual and motor contributions to performance and ERP components after incorrect motor activation in a flanker reaction task , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  H. Lüders,et al.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[4]  S. Jackson,et al.  The selection and suppression of action: ERP correlates of executive control in humans. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[5]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  H G Vaughan,et al.  The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[8]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K. J. Bruin,et al.  Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  D Brandeis,et al.  Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  S. O’Mara,et al.  Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of visuomotor learning during a visual search task. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[13]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[16]  P. Michie,et al.  ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Polich,et al.  Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[19]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  A. Fallgatter,et al.  Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Martina Rieger,et al.  Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with traumatic brain injury , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire , 1997 .

[23]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[24]  M Spitzer,et al.  The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event‐related potentials in a go/no go task , 1998, Neuroreport.

[25]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  C Andrew,et al.  Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Cortical potentials related to the nogo decision , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.