Applying Critical Voice in Design of User Interfaces for Supporting Self-Reflection and Emotion Regulation in Online News Commenting

On digital media services, uncivil commenting is a persistent issue causing negative emotional reactions. One enabler for such problematic behavior is the user interface, conditioning, and structuring text-based communication online. However, the specific roles and influences of UIs are little understood, which calls for critical analysis of the current UI solutions as well as speculative exploration of alternative designs. This paper reports a research-through-design study on the problematic phenomenon regarding uncivil and inconsiderate commenting on online news, envisioning unconventional solutions with a critical voice. We unpack this problem area and outline critical perspectives to possible solutions by describing and analyzing four designs that propose to support emotion regulation by facilitating self-reflection. The design choices are further discussed in respect to interviews of ten news media experts. The findings are reflected against the question of how can critique meaningfully manifest in this challenging problem area.

[1]  Gina Masullo Chen,et al.  Nasty online comments anger you more than me, but nice ones make me as happy as you , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Matt Malpass,et al.  Contextualising Critical Design: Towards a Taxonomy of Critical Practice in Product Design , 2012 .

[3]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasets , 2019, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online.

[4]  Matt Malpass,et al.  Between Wit and Reason: Defining Associative, Speculative, and Critical Design in Practice , 2013 .

[5]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation , 2012, DIS '12.

[6]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[7]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Putting Feelings Into Words: Affect Labeling as Implicit Emotion Regulation , 2018 .

[8]  Nitin Agarwal,et al.  Identifying Toxicity Within YouTube Video Comment , 2019, SBP-BRiMS.

[9]  Fabian Prochazka,et al.  Effects of Civility and Reasoning in User Comments on Perceived Journalistic Quality , 2018 .

[10]  J. D. Wolfgang.  Taming the ‘trolls’: How journalists negotiate the boundaries of journalism and online comments , 2018 .

[11]  Ingmar Weber,et al.  Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language , 2017, ICWSM.

[12]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[13]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[14]  Myungsuk Kim,et al.  Pause Moment Experience in SNS Communication , 2015, CHI.

[15]  Sophia Kluge,et al.  Computation And Human Experience , 2016 .

[16]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Vera D. Khovanskaya,et al.  "Everybody knows what you're doing": a critical design approach to personal informatics , 2013, CHI.

[18]  Mehmet Fatih Çömlekçi.  Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media , 2019 .

[19]  Tom Feltwell,et al.  Rethinking Engagement with Online News through Social and Visual Co-Annotation , 2018, CHI.

[20]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[21]  Netta Iivari,et al.  Towards Critical Design Science Research , 2017, ICIS.

[22]  Matti Nelimarkka,et al.  Party Politics, Values and the Design of Social Media Services , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Robert M. Fano.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1985, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[24]  J. Walther.  Impression Development in Computer-Mediated Interaction. , 1993 .

[25]  Netta Iivari,et al.  Critical Design Research and Information Technology: Searching for Empowering Design , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[26]  Chris Arney.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[27]  Geoff Kaufman,et al.  Designing User Interface Elements to Improve the Quality and Civility of Discourse in Online Commenting Behaviors , 2019, CHI.

[28]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[29]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation , 2008, COMMA.

[30]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Towards quality discourse in online news comments , 2011, CSCW.

[31]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 1990 .

[32]  B. Gardiner,et al.  The dark side of Guardian comments , 2016 .

[33]  J. Gross.  The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 1998 .

[34]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI , 2015, CHI.

[35]  Simon John Bowen,et al.  A critical artefact methodology : using provocative conceptual designs to foster human-centred innovation , 2009 .

[36]  L. Cranor,et al.  Nudges for Privacy and Security , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[37]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[38]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Imaginary Design Workbooks: Constructive Criticism and Practical Provocation , 2018, CHI.

[39]  L. K. Johannessen.  The Young Designer ’ s Guide to Speculative and Critical Design , 2017 .

[40]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[41]  Karoline Andrea Ihlebæk,et al.  User Experiences with Editorial Control in Online Newspaper Comment Fields , 2018 .

[42]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Aesthetic, Functional and Conceptual Provocation in Research Through Design , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[43]  Bruce M. Tharp,et al.  Discursive Design , 2019 .

[44]  Joel R. Tetreault,et al.  Finding Good Conversations Online: The Yahoo News Annotated Comments Corpus , 2017, LAW@ACL.

[45]  Ian Rowe,et al.  Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion , 2015 .

[46]  Alan Borning,et al.  Supporting reflective public thought with considerit , 2012, CSCW.

[47]  Amos N. Guiora,et al.  Hate Speech on Social Media , 2017, Philosophia.

[48]  James Pierce,et al.  Working by Not Quite Working: Resistance as a Technique for Alternative and Oppositional Designs , 2015 .

[49]  Andrés Lucero,et al.  Technologies for Enhancing Collocated Social Interaction: Review of Design Solutions and Approaches , 2019, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[50]  Nina Springer,et al.  User comments: motives and inhibitors to write and read , 2015 .

[51]  M. Blythe,et al.  Critical Theory and Interaction Design , 2018 .

[52]  L. Bovens.  The Ethics of Nudge , 2009 .

[53]  Jason Reifler,et al.  PARTY POLARIZATION IN AMERICAN POLITICS : Characteristics , Causes , and Consequences , 2013 .

[54]  J. D. Wolfgang.  Cleaning up the “Fetid Swamp” , 2018 .

[55]  Brendan Walker,et al.  The Drift Table , 2005 .

[56]  G. Chen,et al.  Normalizing Online Comments , 2017 .

[57]  Ross A. Knepper,et al.  Human expectations of social robots , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[58]  Minna Ruckenstein,et al.  Re-humanizing the platform: Content moderators and the logic of care , 2020, New Media Soc..