A Harmonic Wave Kernel Signature for Three-Dimensional Skull Similarity Measurements

The 3D skull is a well preserved bone under the effect of fire, humidity, temperature changes, and it is a important biological characteristic in the fields of archaeology, forensic science and anthropology. In particular, measuring the 3D skull similarity is a challenging and meaningful task. 3D skulls are geometric models with multiple holes and complex topologies. It is difficult to correctly calculate the similarity between 3D skulls because the general 3D shape similarity measurement is sensitive to boundaries. In this paper, we provide an effective pipeline for measuring the 3D skull similarity by calculating the cosine distance between the harmonic wave kernel signature (HWKS) values of 3D skulls. Based on the wave kernel signature, the HWKS is a shape descriptor which is involved the Laplace-Beltrami operator that can effectively extract geometrical and topological information from the 3D skulls. And the HWKS simultaneously describes the local and global properties of a skull compared to the wave kernel signature. In addition, our method is more flexible, and can be generalized to other 3D shapes. Several experiments show our method achieves good results and can correctly calculate the similarity between 3D skulls.

[1]  T. Fenton,et al.  Skull‐Photo Superimposition and Border Deaths: Identification Through Exclusion and the Failure to Exclude * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Sergio Silvestri,et al.  Determination of stature from skeletal and skull measurements by CT scan evaluation. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[3]  N Samman,et al.  Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. , 2000, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  P Vanezi,et al.  Facial reconstruction using 3-D computer graphics. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[5]  Mohamed Tayeb Laskri,et al.  A 3D deformable model constrained by anthropometric knowledge for computerized facial reconstructions , 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA).

[6]  Jin Wu-xi Similarity measurement method of skull and craniofacial data , 2013 .

[7]  Maks Ovsjanikov,et al.  Functional maps , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[8]  M Katherine Spradley,et al.  Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A concise and provably informative multi-scale signature based on heat diffusion , 2009 .

[10]  Maxime Berar,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction as a prediction problem using a Latent Root Regression model , 2011, Forensic science international.

[11]  Oscar Cordón,et al.  Forensic identification by computer-aided craniofacial superimposition: A survey , 2011, CSUR.

[12]  Romany F. Mansour,et al.  Evolutionary computing enriched ridge regression model for craniofacial reconstruction , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[13]  Mingquan Zhou,et al.  A PCA-Based method for determining craniofacial relationship and sexual dimorphism of facial shapes , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  Jung-Hyun Kim,et al.  Evaluation of automated and semi-automated skull-stripping algorithms using similarity index and segmentation error , 2003, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  Pravin K. Patel,et al.  Application of Virtual Surgical Planning with Computer Assisted Design and Manufacturing Technology to Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery , 2012, Archives of plastic surgery.

[16]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  The wave kernel signature: A quantum mechanical approach to shape analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops).

[17]  Yun Tian,et al.  Skull Identification via Correlation Measure Between Skull and Face Shape , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.