Effects of annotations on student readers and writers

Recent research on annotations has focused on how readers annotate texts, ignoring the question of how reading annotations might affect subsequent readers of a text. This paper reports on a study of persuasive essays written by 123 undergraduates receiving primary source materials annotated in various ways. Findings indicate that annotations improve Findings indicate that annotations improve recall of emphasized items, influence how specific arguments in the source materials are perceived, decrease students' tendencies to unnecessarily summarize. Of particular interest is that students' perceptions of the annotator appeared to greatly influence how they responded to the annotated material. Using this study as a basis, I discuss implications for the design and implementation of digitally annotated materials.

[1]  R. W. Kulhavy,et al.  Note-Taking and Passage Style. , 1981 .

[2]  L. Flower,et al.  Reading-to-Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process , 1990 .

[3]  M. Kennedy The Composing Process of College Students Writing from Sources , 1985 .

[4]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Dynomite: a dynamically organized ink and audio notebook , 1997, CHI.

[5]  Linda Flower,et al.  Writer-Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing. , 1979 .

[6]  Karen A. Schriver Teaching Writers to Anticipate Readers' Needs , 1992 .

[7]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Student readers' use of library documents: implications for library technologies , 1998, CHI.

[8]  G. Schumacher,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Knowledge Change Due to Writing , 1991, Research in the Teaching of English.

[9]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Annotation: from paper books to the digital library , 1997, DL '97.

[10]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Introducing a digital library reading appliance into a reading group , 1999, DL '99.

[11]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Annotation technology , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  R. Fowler,et al.  Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material. , 1974 .

[13]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[14]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Linking by inking: trailblazing in a paper-like hypertext , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[15]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents , 1997, CHI.

[16]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  Reading and Writing without Authority. , 1994 .

[17]  Valjean M. Cashen,et al.  Role of the Isolation Effect in a Formal Educational Setting. , 1970 .

[18]  James H. Crouse,et al.  Effects of Encoding Cues on Prose Learning. , 1972 .

[19]  Andrea A. Lunsford The Presence of Others , 1996 .