Prioritizing barrier removal to improve functional connectivity of rivers

Summary 1. Freshwater systems are severely impacted by connectivity reduction due to the construction of dams and weirs. The breach of this longitudinal connectivity imperils freshwater fish species world-wide. There is thus an increasing need for numerical tools that help decisionmakers correctly allocate resources to prioritize restoration actions. 2. This study provides a methodology for prioritizing the removal of barriers. It is based on spatial graphs, which represent structural units as nodes and relationships between nodes as links, and uses habitat suitability modelling (Boosted Regression Trees) to weight nodes. To exemplify the application of this procedure, we used the Tagus River network and evaluated the impact of the dams (29 built between 1928 and 2004) on the occurrence of each of two fish species (Iberian barbel Luciobarbus bocagei – representing large potamodromous fish; and southern Iberian chub Squalius pyrenaicus – representing small water-column residents) and on the combination of both. 3. Results show that dam construction on the Tagus was responsible for a 484–544% reduction in river connectivity for different fish species. Actions to promote connectivity in just seven of the dams would increase connectivity by 350–372%. 4. The removal of a single barrier chosen through prioritization had a greater overall connectivity increase than the random removal of seven barriers. 5. Synthesis and applications. The proposed prioritization method, using spatial graphs and habitat suitability modelling, makes it possible to model the impact of the removal or placement of an insurmountable barrier on the overall functional connectivity of a river network, facilitating resource allocation and minimizing the impact of new barrier implementation.

[1]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Optimizing multiple dam removals under multiple objectives: Linking tributary habitat and the Lake Erie ecosystem , 2009 .

[3]  Matthew Diebel,et al.  Prioritizing Road Crossing Improvement to Restore Stream Connectivity for Stream-Resident Fish , 2010 .

[4]  J. F. Paul.  Developing and applying an index of environmental integrity for the US Mid-Atlantic region. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[7]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[8]  Donald J. Orth,et al.  Application and Testing of an Index of Biotic Integrity in Small, Coolwater Streams , 1986 .

[9]  J. Fischenich,et al.  Assessing upstream fish passage connectivity with network analysis. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  James E Hines,et al.  Connectivity in an Agricultural Landscape as Reflected by Interpond Movements of a Freshwater Turtle , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Yolanda F. Wiersma,et al.  A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[13]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices , 2011 .

[14]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[15]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatial Graphs: Principles and Applications for Habitat Connectivity , 2007, Ecosystems.

[16]  Greg Ridgeway,et al.  Generalized Boosted Models: A guide to the gbm package , 2006 .

[17]  A. Haro,et al.  Quantifying migratory delay: a new application of survival analysis methods , 2003 .

[18]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  Developments in electric fishing , 1990 .

[19]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation , 1995 .

[20]  Julian D Olden,et al.  Machine Learning Methods Without Tears: A Primer for Ecologists , 2008, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[21]  R. Rolls.  The role of life-history and location of barriers to migration in the spatial distribution and conservation of fish assemblages in a coastal river system , 2011 .

[22]  P. Gleick.  Global Freshwater Resources: Soft-Path Solutions for the 21st Century , 2003, Science.

[23]  P. Kočovský,et al.  Prioritizing removal of dams for passage of diadromous fishes on a major river system , 2009 .

[24]  Robert S. Schick,et al.  Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network , 2007 .

[25]  Pedro Segurado,et al.  Using spatial network structure in landscape management and planning: A case study with pond turtles , 2011 .

[26]  Jennifer A. Miller.  Species Distribution Modeling , 2010 .

[27]  Kevin R. Crooks,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature , 2006 .

[28]  Paulo Branco,et al.  Prioritizing restoration of structural connectivity in rivers: a graph based approach , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  C. Revelle,et al.  A multiobjective optimization model for dam removal: an example trading off salmon passage with hydropower and water storage in the Willamette basin , 2005 .

[30]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Characterizing connectivity relationships in freshwaters using patch-based graphs , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  T. Northcote,et al.  Migratory Behaviour of Fish and its Significance to Movement through Riverine Fish Passage Facilities , 1998 .

[32]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Intercontinental Comparison of Small-Lake Fish Assemblages: The Balance between Local and Regional Processes , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[33]  M. T. Ferreira,et al.  Effects of small hydropower plants on fish assemblages in medium‐sized streams in central and northern Portugal , 2006 .

[34]  Karin Frank,et al.  Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of multi‐year droughts on fish assemblages of seasonally drying Mediterranean streams , 2007 .

[36]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study , 2007 .

[37]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Dispersal, disturbance and the contrasting biogeographies of New Zealand’s diadromous and non‐diadromous fish species , 2008 .

[38]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Network thinking in riverscape conservation – A graph-based approach , 2011 .

[39]  Helmut Mader,et al.  A method for prioritizing the reestablishment of river continuity in Austrian rivers , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[40]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[41]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems , 1983 .

[42]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Geographic, terrestrial and aquatic factors: which most influence the structure of stream fish assemblages in the midwestern United States? , 2000 .

[43]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[44]  J. Harris,et al.  Large‐scale assessments of river health using an Index of Biotic Integrity with low‐diversity fish communities , 1999 .

[45]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[46]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[47]  C. Alexandre,et al.  The impact of small physical obstacles on the structure of freshwater fish assemblages , 2009 .

[48]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape , 2010 .

[49]  João M. Oliveira,et al.  Complex size-dependent habitat associations in potamodromous fish species , 2011, Aquatic Sciences.

[50]  Peter Vogt,et al.  Mapping functional connectivity , 2009 .

[51]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) , 2006 .

[52]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[53]  J. David Allan,et al.  Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Habitat Patch Connectivity and Population Survival , 1985 .

[55]  M. T. Ferreira,et al.  Does longitudinal connectivity loss affect the distribution of freshwater fish , 2012 .

[56]  B. Collins,et al.  California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual , 2002 .

[57]  Bodis Katalin,et al.  A pan-European River and Catchment Database , 2007 .

[58]  Michael J. McGrath,et al.  Benefits and drawbacks of two modelling approaches for a generalist carnivore: can models predict where Wile E. Coyote will turn up next? , 2014, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[59]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation , 2011 .

[60]  J. Bernardo,et al.  Simplifying the Jargon of Community Ecology: A Conceptual Approach , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[61]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Influence of matrix habitats on the occurrence of insectivorous bird species in Amazonian forest fragments , 2005 .

[62]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[63]  Raphael M. Kudela,et al.  Development of a logistic regression model for the prediction of toxigenic Pseudo-nitzschia blooms in Monterey Bay, California. , 2009 .

[64]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[65]  David Tomberlin,et al.  Optimizing the removal of small fish passage barriers , 2005 .

[66]  J. Meyer,et al.  Standards for ecologically successful river restoration , 2005 .

[67]  M. Larinier.  Environmental issues, dams and fish migration , 2001 .

[68]  Mark Padgham,et al.  Multiple structural modifications to dendritic ecological networks produce simple responses , 2010 .

[69]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[70]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  From Graphs to Spatial Graphs , 2010 .

[71]  S. Saura,et al.  Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[72]  J. O’Hanley,et al.  Open rivers: barrier removal planning and the restoration of free-flowing rivers. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[73]  Jesse R. O’Hanley,et al.  Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis , 2010 .

[74]  Jane Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Modeling , 2019, Ecology.

[75]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .