The Timescale of Perceptual Evidence Integration Can Be Adapted to the Environment

A key computation underlying perceptual decisions is the temporal integration of "evidence" in favor of different states of the world. Studies from psychology and neuroscience have shown that observers integrate multiple samples of noisy perceptual evidence over time toward a decision. An influential model posits perfect evidence integration (i.e., without forgetting), enabling optimal decisions based on stationary evidence. However, in real-life environments, the perceptual evidence typically changes continuously. We used a computational model to show that, under such conditions, performance can be improved by means of leaky (forgetful) integration, if the integration timescale is adapted toward the predominant signal duration. We then tested whether human observers employ such an adaptive integration process. Observers had to detect visual luminance "signals" of variable strength, duration, and onset latency, embedded within longer streams of noise. Different sessions entailed predominantly short or long signals. The rate of performance improvement as a function of signal duration indicated that observers indeed changed their integration timescale with the predominant signal duration, in accordance with the adaptive integration account. Our findings establish that leaky integration of perceptual evidence is flexible and that cognitive control mechanisms can exploit this flexibility for optimizing the decision process.

[1]  J. Gold,et al.  Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Nick Chater,et al.  Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Buildup of Choice-Predictive Activity in Human Motor Cortex during Perceptual Decision Making , 2009, Current Biology.

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Philip Holmes,et al.  Optimality and Robustness of a Biophysical Decision-Making Model under Norepinephrine Modulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Heeger,et al.  Slow Cortical Dynamics and the Accumulation of Information over Long Timescales , 2012, Neuron.

[8]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Cortico–basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Newsome,et al.  Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[10]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[11]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  A. Rangel,et al.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Optimum Character of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test , 1948 .

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[15]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[17]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[18]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Free choice activates a decision circuit between frontal and parietal cortex , 2008, Nature.

[19]  Adam Kepecs,et al.  Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: rapid forms of perceptual decision making , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[21]  A. Engel,et al.  Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Dynamic Integration of Reward and Stimulus Information in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  D. Burr,et al.  Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds , 2001, Vision Research.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[25]  H. Seo,et al.  A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[27]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  Eddy J. Davelaar,et al.  Neuromodulation of decision and response selection , 2002, Neural Networks.

[29]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  Marius Usher,et al.  Using Time-Varying Evidence to Test Models of Decision Dynamics: Bounded Diffusion vs. the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[31]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[32]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[33]  A. Watson Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[34]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Bounded Integration in Parietal Cortex Underlies Decisions Even When Viewing Duration Is Dictated by the Environment , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Accumulation of Evidence during Sequential Decision Making: The Importance of Top–Down Factors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[37]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Population activity in the human dorsal pathway predicts the accuracy of visual motion detection. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Han L J van der Maas,et al.  Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models. , 2012, Psychological review.