Is Type of Compensation a Predictor of Outcome After Lumbar Fusion?

Study Design. Propensity-matched case-control study. Objective. To examine the impact of compensation status on clinical outcomes after lumbar spine fusion. Summary of Background Data. Workers' compensation has been associated with inferior outcomes after treatment of low back pain. However, patients receiving other forms of compensation, such as long-term disability or government-supported insurance, have not been studied independently. Methods. Patients with complete preoperative and 2-year postoperative data, including Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain, after 1- or 2-level posterolateral lumbar fusion from a single spine surgery practice, were retrospectively identified. Fifty-nine patients 50 years or younger receiving disability compensation and 38 patients receiving workers' compensation were identified from 1144 patients with complete outcome measures. Propensity scoring was used to match cohorts not receiving compensation. Each group was matched for sex, age, smoking status, body mass index, surgical indication, number of levels fused, and baseline outcome measures. Fifty-one and 37 matched pairs were successfully identified for disability and workers' compensation cohorts, respectively. Results. Consistent with propensity matching, no statistically significant difference between cohorts was observed for demographics and baseline outcome measures. At 2-year follow-up, the disability compensation group demonstrated similar degrees of improvement for all outcome measures compared with its matched nondisability cohort, whereas the workers' compensation group demonstrated less improvement than its matched cohort. Conclusion. This study demonstrates a difference in outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion between long-term disability and workers' compensation populations. Although, these populations achieve only marginal improvement, it seems that the type of compensation status influences outcome. Workers' compensation has a clear, negative influence on outcome when compared with controls, whereas well-selected patients receiving disability compensation seem more likely to benefit from lumbar fusion. Therefore, surgeons and researchers alike should not include disability compensation patients in the same cohort as patients on workers' compensation.

[1]  S. Berven,et al.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Are Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Predictive of Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion? , 2009, Spine.

[3]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  Predicting disability from low back pain. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. Laursen,et al.  Smoking as a Predictor of Negative Outcome in Lumbar Spinal Fusion , 2001, Spine.

[5]  Joshua A Hirsch,et al.  Comprehensive review of epidemiology, scope, and impact of spinal pain. , 2009, Pain physician.

[6]  Ricardo Pietrobon,et al.  Estimates and Patterns of Direct Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals With Back Pain in the United States , 2004, Spine.

[7]  D. Singer,et al.  The Impact of Disability Compensation on Long-term Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Sciatica Due to a Lumbar Disc Herniation , 2006, Spine.

[8]  Scott Kretchmar,et al.  Sport , 2009, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism.

[9]  D. Rubin Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. , 2007, Neurologic clinics.

[10]  W. Abdu,et al.  Screening for depressive symptoms in patients with chronic spinal pain using the SF-36 Health Survey. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  Janna Friedly,et al.  Epidemiology of spine care: the back pain dilemma. , 2010, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[12]  Katrina M. Krause,et al.  Obesity and workers' compensation: results from the Duke Health and Safety Surveillance System. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  H. An,et al.  Lumbar spine surgery in the obese patient. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  R. D'Agostino Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  C. Helmick,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  I. Harris,et al.  Association between compensation status and outcome after surgery: a meta-analysis. , 2005, JAMA.

[17]  M. Burns,et al.  Case-Control Study , 2020, Definitions.

[18]  P. Succop,et al.  Long-term Outcomes of Lumbar Fusion Among Workers’ Compensation Subjects: A Historical Cohort Study , 2011, Spine.

[19]  P. Rosenbaum Model-Based Direct Adjustment , 1987 .

[20]  J. Skinner,et al.  The Impact of Workers' Compensation on Outcomes of Surgical and Nonoperative Therapy for Patients With a Lumbar Disc Herniation: SPORT , 2010, Spine.

[21]  E A Clancy,et al.  Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims. , 1997, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[22]  S. Boden,et al.  The Efficacy of rhBMP-2 for Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Smokers , 2007, Spine.

[23]  G. Andersson,et al.  What Is Different About Worker’s Compensation Patients?: Socioeconomic Predictors of Baseline Disability Status Among Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy , 2007, Spine.

[24]  K. Masters,et al.  Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[25]  D. Ohnmeiss,et al.  The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[26]  P. Landrigan,et al.  Occupational injury and illness in the United States. Estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortality. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[27]  R. Deyo,et al.  Patient-Oriented Outcomes From Low Back Surgery: A Community-Based Study , 2000, Spine.

[28]  S. Snook,et al.  The Cost of 1989 Workers' Compensation Low Back Pain Claims , 1994, Spine.

[29]  K. Maher,et al.  A historical cohort study of mortality among chemical researchers. , 1986, Archives of environmental health.

[30]  S. Glassman,et al.  Clinical Outcomes After Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Workers' Compensation Patients: A Case-Control Study , 2010, Spine.

[31]  R. Deyo,et al.  Descriptive Epidemiology of Low‐back Pain and Its Related Medical Care in the United States , 1987, Spine.

[32]  D G Wilder,et al.  Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  S. Berven,et al.  Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Association Between Obesity and Functional Status in Patients With Spine Disease , 2002, Spine.

[35]  J. Uomoto,et al.  Use of the MMPI and MCMI in predicting outcome of lumbar laminectomy. , 1988, Journal of clinical psychology.

[36]  R. Keller,et al.  Long-Term Disability and Return to Work Among Patients Who Have a Herniated Lumbar Disc: The Effect of Disability Compensation* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  A. Copay,et al.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[38]  A. Block,et al.  Presurgical Psychological Screening in Back Pain Patients: A Review , 2001, The Clinical journal of pain.