Vagueness and Order Effects in Color Categorization

This paper proposes an experimental investigation of the use of vague predicates in dynamic sorites. We present the results of two studies in which subjects had to categorize colored squares at the borderline between two color categories (Green vs. Blue, Yellow vs. Orange). Our main aim was to probe for hysteresis in the ordered transitions between the respective colors, namely for the longer persistence of the initial category. Our main finding is a reverse phenomenon of enhanced contrast (i.e. negative hysteresis), present in two different tasks, a comparative task involving two color names, and a yes/no task involving a single color name, but not found in a corresponding color matching task. We propose an optimality-theoretic explanation of this effect in terms of the strict-tolerant framework of Cobreros et al. (J Philos Log 1–39, 2012), in which borderline cases are characterized in a dual manner in terms of overlap between tolerant extensions, and underlap between strict extensions.

[1]  Paul Egré SORITICAL SERIES AND FISHER SERIES , 2013 .

[2]  Paul Égré,et al.  Perceptual Ambiguity and the Sorites , 2009, ViC.

[3]  Igor Douven,et al.  Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach , 2011, Journal of Philosophical Logic.

[4]  David Ripley,et al.  Contradictions at the Borders , 2009, ViC.

[5]  H. Kamp The Paradox of the heap , 1981 .

[6]  R. M. Gaze Dynamic patterns , 1975, Nature.

[7]  J A Kelso,et al.  The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions , 2011 .

[9]  J. Hampton,et al.  Comparison and contrast in perceptual categorization. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Diana Raffman,et al.  Vagueness without paradox , 1994 .

[11]  H Kalmus Dependence of colour naming and monochromator setting on the direction of preceding changes in wavelength. , 1979, The British journal of physiological optics.

[12]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  On the psychology of vague predicates , 1999 .

[13]  Diana Raffman,et al.  How to understand contextualism about vagueness: reply to Stanley , 2005 .

[14]  Howard S Hock,et al.  Dynamical vs. judgmental comparison: hysteresis effects in motion perception. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[15]  Dominic Hyde,et al.  From heaps and gaps to heaps of gluts , 1997 .

[16]  Gunther W. Balz,et al.  Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  John Collins Vagueness and Degrees of Truth – Nicholas J.J. Smith , 2010 .

[18]  Diana Raffman The Competent Use of Vague Words , 2014 .

[19]  M Jalie The design of intra-ocular lenses. , 1978, The British journal of physiological optics.

[20]  Richard Zach,et al.  Vagueness, Logic and Use: Four Experimental Studies on Vagueness , 2011 .

[21]  Rick Nouwen,et al.  Vagueness in Communication , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[22]  K. Fine Vagueness, truth and logic , 1975, Synthese.

[23]  David Ripley,et al.  Vagueness, Truth and Permissive Consequence , 2015 .

[24]  David Ripley,et al.  Tolerant, Classical, Strict , 2010, Journal of Philosophical Logic.

[25]  Terence Horgan,et al.  ROBUST VAGUENESS AND THE FORCED-MARCH SORITES PARADOX , 1994 .