The Unique Challenges for Creative Small Businesses Seeking Feedback on Social Media

Social media can be an effective source of feedback on open-ended work, such as product design. Unlike large businesses with entire teams dedicated to "social," little is understood about how small business owners-constrained both in personnel and resources-leverage the benefits of direct, informal communication channels afforded by social media. Drawing on a series of design workshops and interviews with 26 small business owners at a local feminist makerspace, we report on the unique challenges small business owners experience when seeking feedback on open-ended work via social media. We found participants carefully balanced large-scale access to diverse audiences with attempts to receive reliable feedback, and they often targeted audiences narrowly to reinstate control and build trust. In addition, the small business owners in our workshop idealized building authentic relationships with their social audiences to create collectively. To do so successfully, participants detailed the extensive behind-the-scenes work required of them such as navigating blurred personal and business identities and the self-regulation necessary to continuously stay engaged and not internalize discouraging feedback.

[1]  Wei Wu,et al.  Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique , 2015, CSCW.

[2]  P. Govers 'I love my Jeep, because it is tough like me' : The influence of product-personality congruence on product attachment , 2004 .

[3]  P. Resnick,et al.  Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design , 2012 .

[4]  Justin Cheng,et al.  Peer and self assessment in massive online classes , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[5]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces , 2015, CSCW.

[6]  Yasmine Kotturi,et al.  Why do Designers in the "Wild" Wait to Seek Feedback until Later in their Design Process? , 2019, Creativity & Cognition.

[7]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Social Network, Web Forum, or Task Market?: Comparing Different Crowd Genres for Design Feedback Exchange , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[8]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be , 2009, CHI.

[9]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Listen to Others, Listen to Yourself: Combining Feedback Review and Reflection to Improve Iterative Design , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[10]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[11]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress , 2016, CSCW.

[12]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  From in the Class or in the Wild?: Peers Provide Better Design Feedback Than External Crowds , 2017, CHI.

[13]  B. Zimmerman Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[14]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[15]  Elizabeth Fish Hatfield (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work , 2018 .

[16]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Share Once or Share Often?: Exploring How Designers Approach Iteration in a Large Online Community , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[17]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites , 2008, CHI.

[18]  Lan Li,et al.  Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Getting the right design and the design right , 2006, CHI.

[20]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Effects of peer feedback on contribution: a field experiment in Wikipedia , 2013, CHI.

[21]  A. Hochschild,et al.  The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. , 1985 .

[22]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[23]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[24]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Do your friends make you smarter?: An analysis of social strategies in online information seeking , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Engaging Low-Income African American Older Adults in Health Discussions through Community-based Design Workshops , 2019, CHI.

[26]  Wei Wu,et al.  CrowdCrit: crowdsourcing and aggregating visual design critique , 2014, CSCW Companion.

[27]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Effectiveness of shared leadership in online communities , 2012, CSCW.

[29]  Xiao Ma,et al.  When Do People Trust Their Social Groups? , 2019, CHI.

[30]  Allan Ahlberg Who Knows? , 1999, Security Protocols Workshop.

[31]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Learning how: the search for craft knowledge on the internet , 2009, CHI.

[32]  B. Buunk,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships , 2006 .

[33]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Additional Labors of the Entrepreneurial Self , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Using Anonymity and Communal Efforts to Improve Quality of Crowdsourced Feedback , 2015, HCOMP.

[35]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  A Classroom Study of Using Crowd Feedback in the Iterative Design Process , 2015, CSCW.

[36]  M. Lerner,et al.  Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis , 2010 .

[37]  J. Füller,et al.  Brand Community Members as a Source of Innovation , 2008 .

[38]  Bill Buxton,et al.  Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design , 2007 .

[39]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  What do you think?: a case study of benefit, expectation, and interaction in a large online critique community , 2012, CSCW.

[40]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class , 2017, CHI.

[41]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Fruitful Feedback: Positive Affective Language and Source Anonymity Improve Critique Reception and Work Outcomes , 2017, CSCW.

[42]  Steven Dow,et al.  Paragon: An Online Gallery for Enhancing Design Feedback with Visual Examples , 2018, CHI.

[43]  Mary L. Gray,et al.  Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass , 2019 .

[44]  M. Indergaard Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries , 2014 .

[45]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Critique Style Guide: Improving Crowdsourced Design Feedback with a Natural Language Model , 2017, CHI.

[46]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Voyant: generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts , 2014, CSCW.

[47]  F. Piller,et al.  From Social Media to Social Product Development: The Impact of Social Media on Co-Creation of Innovation , 2012 .

[48]  H. Moore Shortchanged: Why Women Have Less Wealth and What Can Be Done About It , 2012 .

[49]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Online Feedback Exchange: A Framework for Understanding the Socio-Psychological Factors , 2017, CHI.

[50]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook , 2013, ICWSM.

[51]  A. Strauss Work and the Division of Labor , 1985 .

[52]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Out of Time, Out of Place: Reflections on Design Workshops as a Research Method , 2016, CSCW.

[53]  Jennifer Marlow,et al.  From rookie to all-star: professional development in a graphic design social networking site , 2014, CSCW.

[54]  Tawanna R. Dillahunt,et al.  Positive Feedback and Self-Reflection: Features to Support Self-efficacy among Underrepresented Job Seekers , 2020, CHI.

[55]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance , 2015, L@S.

[56]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[57]  Julie Hui,et al.  Community Collectives: Low-tech Social Support for Digitally-Engaged Entrepreneurship , 2020, CHI.

[58]  Yu-Chun Yen,et al.  Enhancing the Usage of Crowd Feedback for Iterative Design , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[59]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[60]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  The Methodology of Participatory Design , 2005 .

[61]  Thomas Kelley,et al.  Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All , 2013 .

[62]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior , 2010, CHI.

[63]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west , 2011, CHI.

[64]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Crowd-based design activities: helping students connect with users online , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[65]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[66]  Valerie Purdie-Vaughns,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Breaking the Cycle of Mistrust : Wise Interventions to Provide Critical Feedback Across the Racial Divide , 2013 .