Safety Impacts of Queue Warning in a Connected Vehicle Environment

Queue warning systems (QWSs) have been implemented to increase traffic safety by informing drivers about queued traffic ahead so that they can react in a timely manner to the queue. Existing QWSs rely on fixed traffic sensors to detect the back of a queue. It is expected that if the transmitted messages from connected vehicles (CVs) are used for this purpose, detection can be faster and more accurate. In addition, with CVs, delivery of the messages can be done with onboard units instead of dynamic message signs and provide more flexibility on how far upstream of the queue the messages are delivered. This study investigates the accuracy and benefits of the QWS on the basis of CV data. The study evaluated the safety benefits of the QWS under different market penetrations of CVs in future years. Surrogate safety measures were estimated with simulation modeling combined with the surrogate safety assessment model tool. Results from this study indicate that a relatively low market penetration—about 3% to 6%—for the congested freeway examined in this study was sufficient for an accurate and reliable estimation of the queue length. Even at 3% market penetration, the CV-based estimation of back-of-queue identification was significantly more accurate than that based on detector measurements. The results also found that CV data allowed faster detection of the bottleneck and queue formation. Further, the QWS improved the safety conditions of the network by reducing the number of rear-end conflicts. Safety effects become significant when the compliance percentage with the queue warning messages is more than 15%.

[1]  Roberto Horowitz,et al.  Calibration of VISSIM for a Congested Freeway , 2004 .

[2]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[3]  Wesley C. Zech,et al.  Evaluation of Messages on Changeable Message Signs as a Speed Control Measure in Highway Work Zones , 2008 .

[4]  Rajat Rajbhandari,et al.  National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Footprint Analysis , 2014 .

[5]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Impacts Assessment of Dynamic Speed Harmonization with Queue Warning: Task 3, Impacts Assessment Report [supporting datasets] , 2015 .

[6]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[7]  Mohammed Hadi,et al.  Detection of Freeway Incidents Based on Vehicle Acceleration Measurements Using Connected Vehicle Data , 2016 .

[8]  Kevin N. Balke,et al.  Simulation Based Evaluation of Dynamic Queue Warning System Performance , 2013 .

[9]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  Safety Effects of Portable End-of-Queue Warning System Deployments at Texas Work Zones , 2016 .

[10]  Nicholas J Garber,et al.  CONTROL OF VEHICLE SPEEDS IN TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONES (WORK ZONES) USING CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS WITH RADAR , 1995 .

[11]  C H Walters,et al.  ADVANCE WARNING OF STOPPED TRAFFIC ON FREEWAYS: CURRENT PRACTICES AND FIELD STUDIES OF QUEUE PROPAGATION SPEEDS , 2003 .

[12]  Srinivasa R Sunkari,et al.  Report on dynamic speed harmonization and queue warning algorithm design. , 2014 .

[13]  Yong Bai,et al.  Determining Effectiveness of PCMS on Reducing Vehicle Speed in Rural Highway Work Zones , 2010 .

[14]  Chunyan Wang,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SPEED REDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR HIGHWAY WORK ZONES , 2002 .

[15]  Erik Minge,et al.  Queue Warning and Travel Time Estimation near a Work Zone , 2014 .

[16]  Denny Stephens,et al.  Intelligent Network Flow Optimization (INFLO) Prototype Seattle Small-Scale Demonstration Report , 2015 .

[17]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  SPEED REDUCTION EFFECTS OF SPEED MONITORING DISPLAYS WITH RADAR IN WORK ZONES ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS , 1995 .

[18]  Stephen P. Mattingly,et al.  Macroscopic Evaluation of Incident-Induced Driver Behavior Changes , 2015 .

[19]  H G Hawkins,et al.  INNOVATIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE IN EUROPE , 1999 .

[20]  Stephen H Richards,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF WORK ZONE SPEED CONTROL TECHNIQUES , 1985 .

[21]  Mecit Cetin,et al.  A methodology for calibrating microscopic simulation for modeling traffic flow under incidents , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[22]  Douglas Gettman,et al.  Balancing Safety and Capacity in an Adaptive Signal Control System—Phase 1 , 2010 .