Optical and Visual Quality With Physical and Visually Simulated Presbyopic Multifocal Contact Lenses

Purpose As multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) expand as a solution for presbyopia correction, a better understanding of their optical and visual performance becomes essential. Also, providing subjects with the experience of multifocal vision before contact lens fitting becomes critical, both to systematically test different multifocal designs and to optimize selection in the clinic. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a simultaneous vision visual simulator (SimVis) to represent MCLs. Methods Through focus (TF) optical and visual quality with a center-near aspheric MCL (low, medium and high near adds) were measured using a multichannel polychromatic Adaptive Optics visual simulator equipped with double-pass, SimVis (temporal multiplexing), and psychophysical channels to allow measurements on-bench and in vivo. On bench TF optical quality of SimVis-simulated MCLs was obtained from double-pass (DP) images and images of an E-stimulus using artificial eyes. Ten presbyopic subjects were fitted with the MCL. Visual acuity (VA) and DP retinal images were measured TF in a 4.00 D range with the MCL on eye, and through SimVis simulations of the same MCLs on the same subjects. Results TF optical (on bench and in vivo) and visual (in vivo) quality measurements captured the expected broadening of the curves with increasing add. Root mean square difference between real and SimVis-simulated lens was 0.031/0.025 (low add), 0.025/0.015 (medium add), 0.019/0.011 (high add), for TF DP and TF LogMAR VA, respectively. A shape similarity metric shows high statistical values (lag κ = 0), rho = 0.811/0.895 (low add), 0.792/0.944 (medium add), and 0.861/0.915 (high add) for TF DP/LogMAR VA, respectively. Conclusions MCLs theoretically and effectively expand the depth of focus. A novel simulator, SimVis, captured the through-focus optical and visual performance of the MCL in most of the subjects. Visual simulators allow subjects to experience vision with multifocal lenses prior to testing them on-eye. Translational Relevance Simultaneous visual simulators allow subjects to experience multifocal vision non-invasively. We demonstrated equivalency between real multifocal contact lenses and SimVis-simulated lenses. The results suggest that SimVis is a suitable technique to aid selection of presbyopic corrections in the contactology practice.

[1]  Derek Nankivil,et al.  Estimating visual acuity from a single wavefront measurement , 2020, BiOS.

[2]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[3]  R. Navarro,et al.  Odd aberrations and double-pass measurements of retinal image quality. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  Eon Kim,et al.  Power Profiles of Commercial Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses , 2016, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  Raúl Martín,et al.  Optical quality and intraocular scattering assessed with a double-pass system in eyes with contact lens induced corneal swelling. , 2014, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[6]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Correction of presbyopia: old problems with old (and new) solutions , 2019, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[7]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration of the Human Eye in the Visible and near Infrared from Wavefront Sensing, Double-pass and Psychophysics References and Links , 2022 .

[8]  M. Jong,et al.  Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. , 2018, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  S. Marcos,et al.  Temporal multiplexing to simulate multifocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[11]  Håkan Johansson,et al.  Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Testing vision with angular and radial multifocal designs using Adaptive Optics , 2017, Vision Research.

[13]  Navneet Gupta,et al.  Visual Comparison of Multifocal Contact Lens to Monovision , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  Image quality in wearers of a centre distance concentric design bifocal contact lens , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Portable simultaneous vision device to simulate multifocal corrections , 2016 .

[16]  Sotiris Plainis,et al.  Through‐focus performance with multifocal contact lenses: effect of binocularity, pupil diameter and inherent ocular aberrations , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  Carlos Dorronsoro,et al.  Perceived image quality with simulated segmented bifocal corrections. , 2016, Biomedical optics express.

[18]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  J Pujol,et al.  Optical performance in eyes wearing two multifocal contact lens designs , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  Edward Anthony LaVilla,et al.  Comparison of vision through surface modulated and spatial light modulated multifocal optics. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[21]  W Neil Charman,et al.  Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[22]  G. Waring,et al.  Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system , 2019, Clinical ophthalmology.

[23]  Maria A. Woodward,et al.  Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  Susana Marcos,et al.  The depth-of-field of the human eye from objective and subjective measurements , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  J T Holladay,et al.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.

[26]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Differences in visual quality with orientation of a rotationally asymmetric bifocal intraocular lens design , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[27]  R Montés-Micó,et al.  Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses: Effect of pupil size. , 2015, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[28]  S. Marcos,et al.  Short-Term Neural Adaptation to Simultaneous Bifocal Images , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  Carlos Dorronsoro,et al.  Experimental validations of a tunable-lens-based visual demonstrator of multifocal corrections. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[30]  Klaus Ehrmann,et al.  Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia. , 2016, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[31]  D. R. Iskander,et al.  Computational Aspects of the Visual Strehl Ratio , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  Klaus Ehrmann,et al.  Optical Performance of Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses via a Single-Pass Method , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[33]  David P Piñero,et al.  Soft multifocal simultaneous image contact lenses: a review , 2017, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[34]  Carlos Dorronsoro,et al.  Tunable lenses: dynamic characterization and fine-tuned control for high-speed applications. , 2019, Optics express.

[35]  W. Ehrenstein,et al.  Psychophysical Methods , 1999 .

[36]  J. González-Méijome,et al.  Combined Effect of Ocular and Multifocal Contact Lens Induced Aberrations on Visual Performance: Center-Distance Versus Center-Near Design , 2018, Eye & contact lens.

[37]  Alejandro Cerviño,et al.  Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses , 2012, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[38]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Experimental simulation of simultaneous vision. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[39]  P. Morgan,et al.  Contact lens correction of presbyopia. , 2009, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[40]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision. , 2019, Biomedical optics express.

[41]  G. Mitchell,et al.  Comparison of Multifocal and Monovision Soft Contact Lens Corrections in Patients With Low-Astigmatic Presbyopia , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[43]  D. R. Iskander,et al.  Depth of focus and visual acuity with primary and secondary spherical aberration , 2011, Vision Research.

[44]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[45]  R. Gregory The Most Expensive Painting in the World , 2007, Perception.

[46]  M. Collins,et al.  Optical Considerations in the Contact Lens Correction of Infant Aphakia , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[47]  Jill Woods,et al.  Visual Performance of a Multifocal Contact Lens versus Monovision in Established Presbyopes , 2015, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[48]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Visual simulators replicate vision with multifocal lenses , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[49]  A. Bradley,et al.  Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[50]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.