The effect of dual-chamber closed-loop stimulation on syncope recurrence in healthy patients with tilt-induced vasovagal cardioinhibitory syncope: a prospective, randomised, single-blind, crossover study

Background The closed-loop stimulation (CLS) pacemaker algorithm is a system that permanently monitors the contractile state of the myocardium and converts the intrinsic information into rate regulation. The role that the CLS algorithm plays in the prevention of syncope recurrences still remains unclear. The aim of our prospective, randomised, single-blind, crossover study was to evaluate the effect of dual-chamber CLS in the prevention of syncope recurrence in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope (VVS) and a cardioinhibitory response to head-up tilt test (HUT) during a 36 months follow-up. Method sand results We studied 50 patients (mean age 53±5.1; 33 male) with the indication for permanent dual-chamber cardiac pacing for HUT-induced vasovagal cardioinhibitory syncope. They were randomised after 1 month of stabilisation period to CLS algorithm features programmed OFF or ON for 18 months each, using a crossover design. The number of syncopal and presyncopal episodes during active treatment was lower than those registered during no treatment (n syncopal episodes: 2 vs 15; p=0.007; n presincopal episodes: 5 vs 30; p = 0.004). Lead parameters remained stable over time, and there were no lead-related complications. Conclusions Based on these 36 months follow-up data, it is concluded that dual-chamber CLS is an effective algorithm for preventing syncope recurrences in healthy patients with tilt-induced vasovagal cardioinhibitory syncope.

[1]  M. Zaccaria,et al.  Closed-loop cardiac pacing vs. conventional dual-chamber pacing with specialized sensing and pacing algorithms for syncope prevention in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope: results of a long-term follow-up. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  P. Golino,et al.  The Main Determinant of Hypotension in Nitroglycerine Tilt‐Induced Vasovagal Syncope , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  P. Marino,et al.  Long-term follow-up of DDDR closed-loop cardiac pacing for the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[4]  J. Blanc,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2009 .

[5]  B. Grubb,et al.  Preliminary observations on the use of closed-loop cardiac pacing in patients with refractory neurocardiogenic syncope , 2009, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[6]  Pietro Cortelli,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). , 2009, European heart journal.

[7]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  Closed loop stimulation in prevention of vasovagal syncope. Inotropy Controlled Pacing in Vasovagal Syncope (INVASY): a multicentre randomized, single blind, controlled study. , 2004, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  W. Shen,et al.  Epidemiology of reflex syncope , 2004, Clinical Autonomic Research.

[9]  J. Townend,et al.  Effects of nitroglycerin treatment on cardiac autonomic control in heart failure , 2004, Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society.

[10]  S. Connolly,et al.  Pacemaker therapy for prevention of syncope in patients with recurrent severe vasovagal syncope: Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS II): a randomized trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[11]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  The DDDR closed loop stimulation for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: results from the INVASY prospective feasibility registry. , 2003, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  A. Pedrote,et al.  Long-term outcome of patients with asystole induced by head-up tilt test. , 2002, European heart journal.

[13]  M. Santini,et al.  Permanent Cardiac Pacing Versus Medical Treatment for the Prevention of Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2001, Circulation.

[14]  M. Brignole,et al.  Dual-chamber pacing in the treatment of neurally mediated tilt-positive cardioinhibitory syncope : pacemaker versus no therapy: a multicenter randomized study. The Vasovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  R. Bexton,et al.  Clinical experience of a new rate drop response algorithm in the treatment of vasovagal and carotid sinus syncope. , 2000, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  S. Connolly,et al.  The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS). A randomized trial of permanent cardiac pacing for the prevention of vasovagal syncope. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  C. Pandozi,et al.  DDD Pacing with Rate Drop Response Function Versus DDI with Rate Hysteresis Pacing for Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  H. Abe,et al.  Treatment of Malignant Neurocardiogenic Vasovagal Syncope with a Rate Drop Algorithm in Dual Chamber Cardiac Pacing , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  T. Kieser,et al.  Effect of dual-chamber pacing with automatic rate-drop sensing on recurrent neurally mediated syncope. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  M. Gammage,et al.  Clinical Experience with Thera DR Rate‐Drop Response Pacing Algorithm in Carotid Sinus Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  A. Raviele,et al.  Usefulness of head-up tilt test in evaluating patients with syncope of unknown origin and negative electrophysiologic study. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  A. Fitzpatrick,et al.  TILTING TOWARDS A DIAGNOSIS IN RECURRENT UNEXPLAINED SYNCOPE , 1989, The Lancet.

[23]  C. Gornick,et al.  Provocation of bradycardia and hypotension by isoproterenol and upright posture in patients with unexplained syncope. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. Cameron,et al.  Isoproterenol induction of vasodepressor-type reaction in vasodepressor-prone persons. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.