Application of differential evolution-based constrained optimization methods to district energy optimization and comparison with dynamic programming

Abstract Metaheuristic optimization methods, as model-free approaches, are expected to be applicable to practical issues (e.g., engineering problems). Although optimization methods have been proposed or improved through many different theoretical studies, they should be tested using not only certain benchmark functions, but also other models representing practical situations, such as those involving discrete control variables and equality or inequality constraints. Hence, in this study, differential evolution based constrained optimization methods were applied to district energy optimization. To obtain theoretical results, several different types of proposed methods were compared with dynamic programming and genetic algorithm. In addition, a parametric study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the population size, mutation rate, and random jumping rate. The proposed method, namely, e -constrained differential evolution with random jumping II, proved capable of producing results that differ from the theoretical results by only 2.1% within a computation time 1/457 of that required by dynamic programming. In addition, the method was superior to genetic algorithm which had been often adopted as a metaheuristic method in engineering problems because the result of the proposed method was 460,417 yen/day and that of genetic algorithm was 660,424 yen/day. Therefore, the proposed method has high potential to provide comprehensive district energy optimization within a realistic computational time.

[1]  Maciej Wieczorek,et al.  A mathematical representation of an energy management strategy for hybrid energy storage system in electric vehicle and real time optimization using a genetic algorithm , 2017 .

[2]  François Maréchal,et al.  Optimal heat pump integration in industrial processes , 2018, Applied Energy.

[3]  Alessandro Bellissima,et al.  Development of an optimization algorithm for the energy management of an industrial Smart User , 2017 .

[4]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Optimization method for multiple heat source operation including ground source heat pump considering dynamic variation in ground temperature , 2017 .

[5]  Tetsuyuki Takahama,et al.  Constrained Optimization by the ε Constrained Differential Evolution with Gradient-Based Mutation and Feasible Elites , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Sven Werner District Heating and Cooling , 2013 .

[7]  Yanxia Sun,et al.  Optimized energy consumption model for smart home using improved differential evolution algorithm , 2019, Energy.

[8]  Malabika Basu,et al.  Multi-objective optimal reactive power dispatch using multi-objective differential evolution , 2016 .

[9]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Metaheuristic optimization methods for a comprehensive operating schedule of battery, thermal energy storage, and heat source in a building energy system , 2015 .

[10]  Ponnuthurai N. Suganthan,et al.  Efficient constraint handling for optimal reactive power dispatch problems , 2012, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[11]  Weerakorn Ongsakul,et al.  An efficient two stage stochastic optimal energy and reserve management in a microgrid , 2015 .

[12]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[13]  Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia,et al.  Genetic algorithm based optimization on modeling and design of hybrid renewable energy systems , 2014 .

[14]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  Mohammad Hassan Moradi,et al.  Optimal siting and sizing of renewable energy sources and charging stations simultaneously based on Differential Evolution algorithm , 2015 .

[16]  S. R. Spea,et al.  Optimal power flow using differential evolution algorithm , 2010 .

[17]  Shi Cheng,et al.  Common Benchmark Functions for Metaheuristic Evaluation: A Review , 2017 .

[18]  Ning Xiong,et al.  USING RANDOM LOCAL SEARCH HELPS IN AVOIDING LOCAL OPTIMUM IN DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION , 2014 .

[19]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution - A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces , 2004 .

[20]  Laxmi Srivastava,et al.  Modified Differential Evolution algorithm for multi-objective VAR management , 2014 .

[21]  Yousef Mohammadi,et al.  A hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Monte Carlo simulation approach to predict hourly energy consumption and generation by a cluster of Net Zero Energy Buildings , 2016 .

[22]  Dirk Uwe Sauer,et al.  Optimized operation of hybrid battery systems for electric vehicles using deterministic and stochastic dynamic programming , 2017 .

[23]  D. Devaraj,et al.  Multi Objective Differential Evolution approach for voltage stability constrained reactive power planning problem , 2014 .

[24]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Operational supply and demand optimisation of a multi-vector district energy system using artificial neural networks and a genetic algorithm , 2019, Applied Energy.

[25]  Seyed Hossein Hosseinian,et al.  A comprehensive method for optimal power management and design of hybrid RES-based autonomous energy systems , 2012 .

[26]  A. Boies,et al.  Distributed energy resource system optimisation using mixed integer linear programming , 2013 .