Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1)

The difficulty of directly measuring gene flow has lead to the common use of indirect measures extrapolated from genetic frequency data. These measures are variants of FST, a standardized measure of the genetic variance among populations, and are used to solve for Nm, the number of migrants successfully entering a population per generation. Unfortunately, the mathematical model underlying this translation makes many biologically unrealistic assumptions; real populations are very likely to violate these assumptions, such that there is often limited quantitative information to be gained about dispersal from using gene frequency data. While studies of genetic structure per se are often worthwhile, and FST is an excellent measure of the extent of this population structure, it is rare that FST can be translated into an accurate estimate of Nm.

[1]  M. Whitlock,et al.  SOME POPULATION GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF COLONY FORMATION AND EXTINCTION: GENETIC CORRELATIONS WITHIN FOUNDING GROUPS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  M. Whitlock.  TEMPORAL FLUCTUATIONS IN DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS AND THE GENETIC VARIANCE AMONG POPULATIONS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  B. Weir.  Genetic Data Analysis II. , 1997 .

[5]  M. Kimura,et al.  The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. , 1964, Genetics.

[6]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[7]  M Slatkin,et al.  Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. , 1987, Science.

[8]  J. Rogers,et al.  Mammalian dispersal patterns: The effects of social structure on population genetics , 1990 .

[9]  D. Mccauley,et al.  Local founding events as determinants of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation , 1995, Heredity.

[10]  P. Ingvarsson,et al.  EXTINCTION‐RECOLONIZATION DYNAMICS IN THE MYCOPHAGOUS BEETLE PHALACRUS SUBSTRIATUS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  R. Ennos.  Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations , 1994, Heredity.

[12]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Distribution of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: Evidence for a Metapopulation Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[13]  J. Nason,et al.  Reproductive and Genetic Consequences of Forest Fragmentation: Two Case Studies of Neotropical Canopy Trees , 1997 .

[14]  B. Husband,et al.  Estimates of gene flow in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): effects of range substructure , 1995, Heredity.

[15]  D. Mccauley.  THE EFFECT OF HOST PLANT PATCH SIZE VARIATION ON THE POPULATION STRUCTURE OF A SPECIALIST HERBIVORE INSECT, TETRAOPES TETRAOPHTHALMUS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  M. Slatkin,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE INDIRECT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AVERAGE LEVELS OF GENE FLOW , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  J. Avise,et al.  Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: implications from nuclear RFLPs. , 1992, Science.

[18]  M. Kimura.  A PROBABILITY METHOD FOR TREATING INBREEDING SYSTEMS, ESPECIALLY WITH LINKED GENES , 1963 .

[19]  J. Neigel,et al.  A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATINGGENE FLOW FROM GENETIC MARKERS1 , 1997 .

[20]  J. Leebens-Mack,et al.  Conservation genetics: beyond the maintenance of marker diversity , 1994 .

[21]  B. E. Giles,et al.  A Case Study of Genetic Structure in a Plant Metapopulation , 1997 .

[22]  M W Feldman,et al.  An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. , 1994, Genetics.

[23]  D. Mccauley.  Extinction, Colonization, and Population Structure: A Study of a Milkweed Beetle , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Endler.  Gene flow and life history patterns. , 1979, Genetics.

[25]  Michael C. Whitlock.  Two-locus drift with sex chromosomes: the partitioning and conversion of variance in subdivided populations. , 1995, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  J. Bossart,et al.  Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: Limitations, lessons and new directions. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[28]  J. Crow,et al.  Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  N. Barton,et al.  The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations , 1986, Heredity.

[30]  Is population genetics mired in the past? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[32]  P. C. Dias,et al.  Sources and sinks in population biology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  M. Whitlock.  Nonequilibrium Population Structure in Forked Fungus Beetles: Extinction, Colonization, and the Genetic Variance Among Populations , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[34]  D. Roff,et al.  The quantitative genetics of wing dimorphism under laboratory and ‘field’ conditions in the cricket Gryllus pennsylvanicus , 1997, Heredity.

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[36]  T. Ebenhard,et al.  Colonization in metapopulations: a review of theory and observations , 1991 .

[37]  L. Noble,et al.  Hybridization and gene flow in house mice introduced into an existing population on an island , 1991 .

[38]  M. Slatkin.  Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[39]  M Slatkin,et al.  A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. , 1995, Genetics.

[40]  R. Boutilier,et al.  Genetic population structure and gene flow in the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua: a comparison of allozyme and nuclear RFLP loci. , 1995, Genetics.

[41]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genetic Data Analysis II . By Bruce S. Weir, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Sinauer Associates, Inc.445 pages. ISBN 0-87893-902-4. , 1996 .

[42]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[43]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON‐EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  P. C. Dias,et al.  Source‐sink populations in Mediterranean Blue tits: evidence using single‐locus minisatellite probes , 1996 .

[45]  D. Mccauley.  GENE FLOW DISTANCES IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF TETRAOPES TETRAOPHTHALMUS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A REFINED METHOD FOR ESTIMATING GENE FLOW FROM ANGIOSPERM PATERNITY ANALYSIS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  Stochastic Migration and Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Sink Populations , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[48]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. , 1997, Genetical research.

[49]  D. Mccauley.  The use of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in studies of gene flow in plants. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  M. Wade,et al.  EXTINCTION AND RECOLONIZATION: THEIR EFFECTS ON THE GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF LOCAL POPULATIONS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[52]  S. Wright.  Isolation by Distance under Diverse Systems of Mating. , 1946, Genetics.

[53]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[54]  R. Wyatt,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR LONG‐DISTANCE POLLEN DISPERSAL IN MILKWEEDS (ASCLEPIAS EXALTATA) , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.