Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer.

[1]  R. Salouti,et al.  Agreement of Corneal Diameter Measurements Obtained by a Swept-source Biometer and a Scheimpflug-based Topographer , 2017, Cornea.

[2]  C. McAlinden,et al.  Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  S. Sel,et al.  Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. , 2017, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[4]  M. Garza-León,et al.  Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens , 2017, International Ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Aloy,et al.  Ocular anatomic changes for different accommodative demands using swept-source optical coherence tomography: a pilot study , 2017, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  B. de Luis Eguileor,et al.  Evaluation of the Reliability and Repeatability of Scheimpflug System Measurement in Keratoconus. , 2017, Cornea.

[7]  Seungbong Han,et al.  Subclassification of Primary Angle Closure Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Parameters. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[8]  Tanja Teuber,et al.  Prediction of postoperative intraocular lens tilt using swept-source optical coherence tomography. , 2017, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Comparison of Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements of 2 Recently Introduced Devices to a Known Biometer. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  G. Savini,et al.  Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Reza Gharebaghi MD MPH FAAO PhDc,et al.  A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Intra Ocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness in Healthy Children , 2017, Iranian journal of public health.

[12]  S. Sel,et al.  Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices , 2017, Journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  M. Aloy,et al.  Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters , 2017, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[14]  C. McAlinden,et al.  Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar , 2017, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Martinez-de-la-Casa,et al.  Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer , 2016, Eye.

[16]  Pipat Kongsap.  Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients , 2016, Eye and Vision.

[17]  E. Özyol,et al.  Agreement Between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Scheimpflug-based Topography Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  G. Savini,et al.  Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[19]  G. Savini,et al.  Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept‐source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low‐coherence reflectometry , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  Narendra K. Puttaiah,et al.  Biometry with a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low‐coherence reflectometry device , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  O. Findl,et al.  Macular disease detection with a swept‐source optical coherence tomography‐based biometry device in patients scheduled for cataract surgery , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  M. Blum,et al.  Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography–based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low‐coherence reflectometry , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  L. Asena,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500 , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  S. Srivannaboon,et al.  Clinical comparison of a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer and a time‐domain optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  Mitchell P. Weikert,et al.  Repeatability and comparability of corneal power and corneal astigmatism obtained from a point‐source color light–emitting diode topographer, a Placido‐based corneal topographer, and a low‐coherence reflectometer , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  I. Bahar,et al.  Repeatability and Intrasession Reproducibility Obtained by the Sirius Anterior Segment Analysis System , 2015, Eye & contact lens.

[27]  G. Savini,et al.  Anterior chamber depth measurements using Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography: Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[28]  Sheng Hui,et al.  Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation , 2014, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  A. Jiménez-Corona,et al.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between three different Scheimpflug systems in measuring corneal and anterior segment biometry. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[30]  M. Labetoulle,et al.  Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: Comparison with the gold standard , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  R. Salouti,et al.  Comparison of Horizontal Corneal Diameter Measurements Using the Orbscan IIz and Pentacam HR Systems , 2013, Cornea.

[32]  S. Graham,et al.  Relationship of change in central corneal thickness to visual field progression in eyes with glaucoma , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[33]  Scott A Read,et al.  Diurnal Variation of Corneal Shape and Thickness , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[34]  T. Olsen,et al.  Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. , 2007, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[35]  A. Fercher,et al.  Performance of fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[36]  L. Thibos,et al.  Power Vectors: An Application of Fourier Analysis to the Description and Statistical Analysis of Refractive Error , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  R. Müller,et al.  A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[38]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[39]  B. Aydın,et al.  Keratoconus Progression Induced by In Vitro Fertilization Treatment. , 2016, Journal of refractive surgery.

[40]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review. , 2016, International journal of ophthalmology.

[41]  D. Piñero,et al.  Intra-session repeatability of iridocorneal angle measurements provided by a Scheimpflug photography-based system in healthy eyes , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.