Inventorying and Monitoring Wetland Condition and Restoration Potential on a Watershed Basis with Examples from Spring Creek Watershed, Pennsylvania, USA

We developed an approach for inventorying wetland resources, assessing their condition, and determining restoration potential in a watershed context. This article outlines how this approach can be developed into a Wetland Monitoring Matrix (WMM) that can help resource management agencies make regulatory and nonregulatory decisions. The WMM can be embedded in a standard planning process (Wetlands, Wildlife, and Watershed Assessment Techniques for Evaluation and Restoration, or W3ATER) involving the setting of objectives, assessing the condition of the resource, prioritizing watersheds or sites, implementing projects, and evaluating progress. To that process we have added the concepts of reference, hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification, and prioritization for protection and restoration by triage or adaptive management. Three levels of effort are possible, increasing in detail and diagnostic reliability as data collection shifts from remote sensing to intensive sampling on the ground. Of key importance is the use of a consistent set of monitoring protocols for conducting condition assessments, designing restoration and creation projects, and evaluating the performance of mitigation projects; the same variables are measured regardless of the intended use of the data. This approach can be tailored to any region by establishing a reference set of wetlands organized by HGM subclasses, prioritizing watersheds and individual wetlands, and implementing consistent monitoring protocols. Application of the approach is illustrated with examples from wetlands and streams of the Spring Creek Watershed in central Pennsylvania, USA.

[1]  L. Jackson,et al.  BIRD GUILDS AS INDICATORS OF ECOLOGICAL CONDITION IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIANS , 2000 .

[2]  P. R. Adamus,et al.  Synoptic approach to cumulative impact assessment. A proposed methodology , 1992 .

[3]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Riparian Restoration in the Western United States: Overview and Perspective , 1997 .

[4]  R. Brooks,et al.  A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[5]  R. Smith,et al.  A regional guidebook for assessing the functions of low gradient, Riverine Wetlands in Western Kentucky , 1999 .

[6]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Effects of Land Cover on Stream Ecosystems: Roles of Empirical Models and Scaling Issues , 2003 .

[7]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  J. Boyd Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act , 2002 .

[9]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  An Approach to Improving Decision-Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation , 1992 .

[10]  J. R. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters , 1998 .

[11]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  The role of sample surveys for monitoring the condition of the nation's lakes , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[12]  M. Brinson,et al.  Application of Reference Data for Assessing and Restoring Headwater Ecosystems , 1999 .

[13]  R. Carline,et al.  Relations among riparian grazing, sediment loads, macroinvertebrates, and fishes in three central Pennsylvania streams , 1996 .

[14]  J. Karr Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[15]  R. Brooks,et al.  Assessing Wetland Condition on a Watershed Basis in the Mid-Atlantic Region Using Synoptic Land-Cover Maps , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[16]  National Research Council,et al.  Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1993 .

[17]  R. Brooks,et al.  Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  S. Larson Joseph,et al.  Rapid assessment of wetlands; history and application to management , 1994 .

[19]  Bob Taft,et al.  Ohio 2004 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report , 2004 .

[20]  J. Karr,et al.  Restoring life in running waters : better biological monitoring , 1998 .

[21]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands Losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's , 1990 .

[22]  Mark S. Dennison,et al.  Wetlands: Guide to Science, Law and Technology , 1994 .

[23]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  Spatially restricted surveys over time for aquatic resources , 1999 .

[24]  W. Mitsch Global wetlands: old world and new , 1994 .

[25]  Indicators of Ecosystem Integrity , 1992 .

[26]  B. Swift Status of Riparian Ecosystems in the United States , 1984 .

[27]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[28]  R. Smith,et al.  An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices; [computer file] /; by R. Daniel Smith ... [et al.] ; prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. , 1995 .

[29]  M. Brinson A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands , 1993 .

[30]  David P. Larsen,et al.  Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials , 1986 .

[31]  R. Brooks,et al.  The Occurrence and Impact of Sedimentation in Central Pennsylvania Wetlands , 1998 .

[32]  James J. Kay,et al.  Thermodynamics and Measures of Ecological Integrity , 1992 .