Effects of compressive residual stress on the morphologic changes of fibroblasts

Recently, the term tensotaxis was proposed to describe the phenomenon that tensile stress or strain affects cell migration. Even so, less attention has been paid to the effects of compressive stress on cell behavior. In this study, by using an injection-molded method combined with photoelastic technology, we developed residual stress gradient-controlled poly-l-lactide discs. After culturing NIH-3T3 fibroblasts on the stress gradient substrate, the cell distributions for high- and low-stress regions were measured and compared. Our results showed that there were significantly more cells in the low-compressive stress region relative to their high-stress analogs (p < 0.05). In addition, NIH-3T3 fibroblasts in the low-compressive stress region expressed more abundant extensive filopodia. These findings provide greater insight into the interaction between cells and substrates, and could serve as a useful reference for connective tissue development and repair.

[1]  S. Tadano,et al.  Residual stress in bone structure and tissue of rabbit's tibiofibula. , 2006, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[2]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell–biomaterial interface: Issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response , 2004 .

[3]  Ilya Digel,et al.  Decrease in extracellular collagen crosslinking after NMR magnetic field application in skin fibroblasts , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  Wen-Bin Young,et al.  Study on residual stresses of thin-walled injection molding , 2005 .

[5]  J. Yang,et al.  Residual Stress Patterns Affect Cell Distributions on Injection-Molded Poly-l-Lactide Substrate , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[7]  A. A. Stein,et al.  Tension-dependent collective cell movements in the early gastrula ectoderm of Xenopus laevis embryos , 2000, Development Genes and Evolution.

[8]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.

[10]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The Effects of Trabecular-Bone Loading Variables on the Surface Signaling Potential for Bone Remodeling and Adaptation , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  P. E. McHugh,et al.  Mathematical Models of Cell Motility , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[12]  C. Zavaglia,et al.  Porous and dense poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(D,L-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds: In vitro degradation in culture medium and osteoblasts culture , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  D. Schlaepfer,et al.  The Focal Adhesion Kinase‐‐A Regulator of Cell Migration and Invasion , 2002, IUBMB life.

[14]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[16]  K. Anselme,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[17]  Dequn Li,et al.  Analysis of thermal residual stress in plastic injection molding , 2000 .

[18]  M. Chiang,et al.  Cell morphology and migration linked to substrate rigidity. , 2007, Soft matter.

[19]  J D Stitzel,et al.  Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation on a Novel Biomimicking, Biodegradable Vascular Graft Scaffold , 2001, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[20]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  D. Lacroix,et al.  Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: Application to fracture healing , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[23]  Yu-Li Wang,et al.  Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[24]  M Eastwood,et al.  Effect of precise mechanical loading on fibroblast populated collagen lattices: morphological changes. , 1998, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[25]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano‐topography and fibroblast filopodia , 2004, Cell biology international.

[28]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Xi Chen,et al.  On the determination of residual stress and mechanical properties by indentation , 2006 .