Interlaboratory comparison of in vitro bioassays for screening of endocrine active chemicals in recycled water.

In vitro bioassays have shown promise as water quality monitoring tools. In this study, four commercially available in vitro bioassays (GeneBLAzer(®) androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and progesterone receptor (PR) assays) were adapted to screen for endocrine active chemicals in samples from two recycled water plants. The standardized protocols were used in an interlaboratory comparison exercise to evaluate the reproducibility of in vitro bioassay results. Key performance criteria were successfully achieved, including low background response, standardized calibration parameters and high intra-laboratory precision. Only two datasets were excluded due to poor calibration performance. Good interlaboratory reproducibility was observed for GR bioassay, with 16-26% variability among the laboratories. ER and PR bioactivity was measured near the bioassay limit of detection and showed more variability (21-54%), although interlaboratory agreement remained comparable to that of conventional analytical methods. AR bioassay showed no activity for any of the samples analyzed. Our results indicate that ER, GR and PR, were capable of screening for different water quality, i.e., the highest bioactivity was observed in the plant influent, which also contained the highest concentrations of endocrine active chemicals measured by LC-MS/MS. After advanced treatment (e.g., reverse osmosis), bioactivity and target chemical concentrations were both below limits of detection. Comparison of bioassay and chemical equivalent concentrations revealed that targeted chemicals accounted for ≤5% of bioassay activity, suggesting that detection limits by LC-MS/MS for some chemicals were insufficient and/or other bioactive compounds were present in these samples. Our study demonstrated that in vitro bioassays responses were reproducible, and can provide information to complement conventional analytical methods for a more comprehensive water quality assessment.

[1]  L. Bláha,et al.  Europe-wide survey of estrogenicity in wastewater treatment plant effluents: the need for the effect-based monitoring , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[2]  Francesco Busetti,et al.  Which chemicals drive biological effects in wastewater and recycled water? , 2014, Water research.

[3]  Shane A. Snyder,et al.  Emerging chemical contaminants: Looking for greater harmony , 2014 .

[4]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[5]  T. Ternes,et al.  Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for contaminants of emerging concern in water. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  Annemarie P van Wezel,et al.  High-resolution mass spectrometric identification and quantification of glucocorticoid compounds in various wastewaters in the Netherlands. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Benchmarking organic micropollutants in wastewater, recycled water and drinking water with in vitro bioassays. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Jianying Hu,et al.  Determination and source apportionment of five classes of steroid hormones in urban rivers. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  David M. Reif,et al.  Endocrine Profiling and Prioritization of Environmental Chemicals Using ToxCast Data , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  A H Piersma,et al.  Evaluation of an alternative in vitro test battery for detecting reproductive toxicants. , 2013, Reproductive toxicology.

[11]  Simon Toze,et al.  Bioanalytical tools for the evaluation of organic micropollutants during sewage treatment, water recycling and drinking water generation. , 2011, Water research.

[12]  Bart Van der Burg,et al.  Detection of multiple hormonal activities in wastewater effluents and surface water, using a panel of steroid receptor CALUX bioassays. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Frederic D L Leusch,et al.  Comparison of five in vitro bioassays to measure estrogenic activity in environmental waters. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  S. Snyder,et al.  Rapid analysis of trace organic compounds in water by automated online solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2015, Talanta.

[15]  Trang Trinh,et al.  Assessment of the application of bioanalytical tools as surrogate measure of chemical contaminants in recycled water. , 2014, Water research.

[16]  H. Leffers,et al.  Comparison of short-term estrogenicity tests for identification of hormone-disrupting chemicals. , 1999 .

[17]  Cyrille A M Krul,et al.  Development of a panel of high-throughput reporter-gene assays to detect genotoxicity and oxidative stress. , 2014, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[18]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Scrutinizing pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Willem G Schoonen,et al.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo screening models for androgenic and estrogenic activities. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[20]  Rebecca A. Trenholm,et al.  Assessment of sample preservation techniques for pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and steroids in surface and drinking water , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.