Shape Correspondence with Isometric and Non-Isometric Deformations

The registration of surfaces with non-rigid deformation, especially non-isometric deformations, is a challenging problem. When applying such techniques to real scans, the problem is compounded by topological and geometric inconsistencies between shapes. In this paper, we capture a benchmark dataset of scanned 3D shapes undergoing various controlled deformations (articulating, bending, stretching and topologically changing), along with ground truth correspondences. With the aid of this tiered benchmark of increasingly challenging real scans, we explore this problem and investigate how robust current stateof-the-art methods perform in different challenging registration and correspondence scenarios. We discover that changes in topology is a challenging problem for some methods and that machine learning-based approaches prove to be more capable of handling non-isometric deformations on shapes that are moderately similar to the training set. CCS Concepts • Theory of computation → Computational geometry; • Computing methodologies → Mesh geometry models; Shape analysis; c © 2019 The Author(s) Eurographics Proceedings c © 2019 The Eurographics Association. R. Dyke et al. / SHREC’19: Shape Correspondence with Isometric and Non-Isometric Deformations

[1]  Hao Li,et al.  Global Correspondence Optimization for Non‐Rigid Registration of Depth Scans , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[2]  Yusuf Sahillioglu,et al.  A Genetic Isometric Shape Correspondence Algorithm with Adaptive Sampling , 2018, ACM Trans. Graph..

[3]  Dieter Fox,et al.  DynamicFusion: Reconstruction and tracking of non-rigid scenes in real-time , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[4]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Gary K. L. Tam,et al.  Diffusion pruning for rapidly and robustly selecting global correspondences using local isometry , 2014, ACM Trans. Graph..

[6]  M. Kilian,et al.  Geometric modeling in shape space , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[7]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A concise and provably informative multi-scale signature based on heat diffusion , 2009 .

[8]  Gary K. L. Tam,et al.  Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  A Survey on Shape Correspondence , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[10]  Gary K. L. Tam,et al.  HDFD - A High Deformation Facial Dynamics Benchmark for Evaluation of Non-Rigid Surface Registration and Classification , 2018, ArXiv.

[11]  Kun Li,et al.  Robust Non-Rigid Registration with Reweighted Position and Transformation Sparsity , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Mathieu Aubry,et al.  3D-CODED: 3D Correspondences by Deep Deformation , 2018, ECCV.

[13]  Mark Pauly,et al.  Dynamic 2D/3D registration for the Kinect , 2013, SIGGRAPH '13.

[14]  Federico Tombari,et al.  Unique Signatures of Histograms for Local Surface Description , 2010, ECCV.

[15]  Gary K. L. Tam,et al.  Non-rigid registration under anisotropic deformations , 2019, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[16]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Matching of Deformable Shapes with Topological Noise , 2016, 3DOR@Eurographics.

[17]  Michael J. Black,et al.  FAUST: Dataset and Evaluation for 3D Mesh Registration , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Vladimir G. Kim,et al.  Blended intrinsic maps , 2011, ACM Trans. Graph..

[19]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Partial Matching of Deformable Shapes , 2016, 3DOR@Eurographics.

[20]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Efficient Deformable Shape Correspondence via Kernel Matching , 2017, 2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV).