V2V for Vehicular Safety Applications

Low delay and high reliability of safety broadcast messages are critical to future intelligent transport systems (ITS). The main objective of this paper is to propose a novel safety broadcast system model to satisfy the latency and reliability requirements of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) applications. Second, using this proposed model, a comprehensive performance evaluation is conducted under different technologies (cellular and IEEE 802.11p) for different vehicle densities in rural and urban scenarios based on a realistic system-level simulator. The performance is further improved by using application layer raptor Q codes as compared to the standard repetition codes proposed in the literature. Results show a coverage improvement of 144 m (rural) and 45 m (urban) using cellular V2V with raptor Q codes as compared to IEEE 802.11p for a target end-to-end delay of 5 ms. This is because IEEE 802.11p suffers from preamble channel estimation especially in urban areas with high collision rate due to the hidden terminal problems. In case of a traffic jam, with higher vehicle density, full duplex (FD) operation is needed for cellular V2V to achieve the target delay. FD operation satisfies the latency requirements even when half the resources are available for V2V transmissions.

[1]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  Performance and Reliability of DSRC Vehicular Safety Communication: A Formal Analysis , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[2]  Robert J. Piechocki,et al.  Systematic raptor codes for safety broadcast in an unsaturated vehicular highway environment , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[3]  David Gomez-Barquero,et al.  AL-FEC for streaming services in LTE E-MBMS , 2013, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[4]  Angela Doufexi,et al.  Multicast Wi-Fi Raptor-enabled data carousel design: simulation and practical implementation , 2016, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[5]  Robert J. Piechocki,et al.  Car-to-Car Safety Broadcast with Interference Using Raptor Codes , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Network Connectivity of VANETs in Urban Areas , 2009, 2009 6th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[7]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  LTEV2Vsim: An LTE-V2V simulator for the investigation of resource allocation for cooperative awareness , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[8]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  EU FP7 INFSO-ICT-317669 METIS, D1.1 Scenarios, requirements and KPIs for 5G mobile and wireless system , 2013 .

[9]  Benoît Champagne,et al.  Enhanced autonomous resource selection for LTE-based V2V communication , 2016, 2016 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[10]  Thomas Kürner,et al.  Physical Layer Performance Comparison of LTE and IEEE 802.11p for Vehicular Communication in an Urban NLOS Scenario , 2014, 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall).

[11]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  How many vehicles in the LTE-V2V awareness range with half or full duplex radios? , 2017, 2017 15th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST).

[12]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  V2V protocols for traffic congestion discovery along routes of interest in VANETs: a quantitative study , 2016, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[13]  E. K. Tameh,et al.  The use of measurement data to analyse the performance of rooftop diffraction and foliage loss algorithms in a 3-D integrated urban/rural propagation model , 1998, VTC '98. 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference. Pathway to Global Wireless Revolution (Cat. No.98CH36151).

[14]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Performance Analysis of V2V Beaconing Using LTE in Direct Mode With Full Duplex Radios , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[15]  Christos Bouras,et al.  Embracing RaptorQ FEC in 3GPP multicast services , 2012, Wireless Networks.