Assessing quality in graduate programs: An internal quality indicator

Many approaches are used to measure quality in graduate education. In this study, the literature related to four approaches is reviewed: the reputational approach, the productivity approach, the correlational approach, and the multidimensional approach. This investigation examined one quality indicator that can be incorporated into the multidimensional approach. In this paper, we describe and analyze faculty judgments of doctoral examinations in the Graduate School at The Ohio State University. Graduate School representatives judge doctoral examinations and report their judgments to the dean of the Graduate School. The judgments are tabulated and presented as quantitative and qualitative indicators of quality. How these judgments are converted to useful data and illustrations of how these data are used and presented are discussed.

[1]  D. R. Morgan.  Assessing Quality Among Graduate Institutions of Higher Education in the United States. , 1976 .

[2]  W. Hagstrom.  Inputs, Outputs, and the Prestige of University Science Departments , 1971 .

[3]  C. F. Elton,et al.  What are the ratings rating , 1972 .

[4]  A. Adams,et al.  Evaluating the quality of American universities: A new approach , 1978 .

[5]  L. Wispé,et al.  The bigger the better: productivity, size, and turnover in a sample of psychology departments. , 1969, The American psychologist.

[6]  Ray L. Carpenter,et al.  The Doctorate in Librarianship and an Assessment of Graduate Library Education. , 1970 .

[7]  S. Singhal,et al.  Some Observations on the Relationships Between Research Productivity and Student Evaluations of Courses and Teaching. , 1969 .

[8]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  A Research Replication. The Reputations of American Professional Schools. , 1974 .

[9]  Russell T. Gregg,et al.  Quality of Faculties and Programs of Graduate Departments of Educational Administration , 1972 .

[10]  H. W. Magoun,et al.  The Cartter Report on Quality in Graduate Education: Institutional and Divisional Standings Compiled from the Report , 1966 .

[11]  J. A. Creager.  THE USE OF PUBLICATION CITATIONS IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH , 1966 .

[12]  D. Crane.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. , 1965, American sociological review.

[13]  M. Clark.  Assessing Dimensions of Quality in Doctoral Education: A Technical Report of a National Study in Three Fields. , 1976 .

[14]  P. Christoffel.  Washington: The Government's Lifelong Commitment , 1977 .

[15]  Albert Somit,et al.  American political science : a profile of a discipline , 1965 .

[16]  A. Bowker.  Quality and Quantity in Higher Education , 1965 .

[17]  A. Bayer,et al.  Some Correlates of a Citation Measure of Productivity in Science , 1966 .

[18]  Diana Crane,et al.  The Academic Marketplace Revisited: A Study of Faculty Mobility Using the Cartter Ratings , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Marian Williams,et al.  Graduate Education in the United States , 1961 .

[20]  P. Lingenfelter,et al.  Assessing Quality in Doctoral Programs: Criteria and Correlates of Excellence. , 1973 .

[21]  William R. Petrowski,et al.  “National Universities” and the ACE Ratings , 1973 .

[22]  J. R. Cole,et al.  The Reputations of American Medical Schools , 1977 .

[23]  P. Blau,et al.  The Peeking Order of the Elite: America's Leading Professional Schools , 1973 .

[24]  K. Green,et al.  A Question of Quality: The Higher Education Ratings Game. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 5, 1980. , 1980 .

[25]  L. Baird,et al.  Reputational ratings of doctoral programs. , 1978, Science.

[26]  D. Drew.  Science Development: An Evaluation Study , 1975 .

[27]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .

[28]  Robert T. Jordan,et al.  Library Characteristics of Colleges Ranking High in Academic Excellence , 1963 .

[29]  H. Keniston.  Graduate study and research in the arts and sciences at the University of Pennsylvania , 1959 .

[30]  Bernard Berelson,et al.  From Graduate Education in the United States , 1961 .

[31]  Charles J. Andersen,et al.  A rating of graduate programs , 1970 .

[32]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. , 1967, American sociological review.

[33]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  Evaluation of University Professors' Research Performance , 1975 .

[34]  W. Miles Cox,et al.  Productivity Ratings of Graduate Programs in Psychology Based on Publication in the Journals of the American Psychological Association. , 1977 .

[35]  Allan M. Cartter,et al.  Assessing quality in graduate education , 1966 .

[36]  C. Myers.  Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. , 1970 .

[37]  J. Muffo.  Relationships between colleague ratings and faculty compensation , 1979 .