Methods for quantifying tongue shape and complexity using ultrasound imaging

ABSTRACT Quantification of tongue shape is potentially useful for indexing articulatory strategies arising from intervention, therapy and development. Tongue shape complexity is a parameter that can be used to reflect regional functional independence of the tongue musculature. This paper considers three different shape quantification methods – based on Procrustes analysis, curvature inflections and Fourier coefficients – and uses a linear discriminant analysis to test how well each method is able to classify tongue shapes from different phonemes. Test data are taken from six native speakers of American English producing 15 phoneme types. Results classify tongue shapes accurately when combined across quantification methods. These methods hold promise for extending the use of ultrasound in clinical assessments of speech deficits.

[1]  Marcos Dipinto,et al.  Discriminant analysis , 2020, Predictive Analytics.

[2]  P. Grassberger Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity , 1986 .

[3]  A Fourier series description of the tongue profile , 2007 .

[4]  Ioana Chitoran,et al.  Complexity in phonetics and phonology: Gradience, categoriality, and naturalness , 2009 .

[5]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Factor analysis of tongue shapes. , 1971, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  An analysis of vocal tract shaping in English sibilant fricatives using real-time magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, INTERSPEECH.

[7]  Elaine R. Hitchcock,et al.  Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: A case study , 2015, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[8]  Richard Burns,et al.  Business Research Methods and Statistics Using SPSS , 2008 .

[9]  C. Kambhamettu,et al.  Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[10]  Christian Kroos,et al.  Analysis of tongue configuration in multi-speaker, multi-volume MRI data , 2000 .

[11]  Bryan Gick,et al.  Exploring the Use of Electropalatography and Ultrasound in Speech Habilitation , 2005 .

[12]  Ashok Samal,et al.  Articulatory distinctiveness of vowels and consonants: a data-driven approach. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  F. Gibbon Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/phonological disorders. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  Bryan Gick,et al.  An Index for Quantifying Tongue Curvature , 2013 .

[15]  R Netsell,et al.  Cineradiographic assessment of articulatory mobility in the dysarthrias. , 1975, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[16]  B. Gick,et al.  Ultrasound in speech therapy with adolescents and adults , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[17]  Bryan Gick,et al.  A Motor Differentiation Model for Liquid Substitutions : English / r / Variants in Normal and Disordered Acquisition , .

[18]  Abeer Alwan,et al.  Imaging applications in speech production research , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[19]  H. Takemoto,et al.  Morphological analyses of the human tongue musculature for three-dimensional modeling. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  Lucie Ménard,et al.  Measuring Tongue Shapes and Positions with Ultrasound Imaging: A Validation Experiment Using an Articulatory Model , 2011, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[21]  P. Grassberger Randomness, Information, and Complexity , 2012, 1208.3459.

[22]  Thomas H. Shawker,et al.  Distinguisability of tongue shape during vowel production , 1985 .

[23]  Lisa Davidson Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M. Stone A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[25]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[26]  Paul J. Smith,et al.  Principal Components Representation of the Two-Dimensional Coronal Tongue Surface , 2002, Phonetica.

[27]  W. Hardcastle,et al.  Quantifying lingual coarticulation using ultrasound imaging data collected with and without head stabilisation , 2015, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[28]  N. Zharkova Using Ultrasound to Quantify Tongue Shape and Movement Characteristics , 2013, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[29]  Maria I. Grigos,et al.  A multidimensional investigation of children's /r/ productions: perceptual, ultrasound, and acoustic measures. , 2013, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[30]  Marianna Di Paolo,et al.  Sociophonetics : a student's guide , 2011 .

[31]  Characterization of Tongue Shape , 1984 .

[32]  Suzanne Boyce,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Peter Grassberger,et al.  How to measure self-generated complexity , 1986 .

[34]  W. Hardcastle,et al.  An instrumental phonetic study of lingual activity in articulation-disordered children. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[35]  Jérôme Aubin Compensation for a labial perturbation : An acoustic and articulatory study of child and adult French speakers , 2006 .

[36]  S. Fels,et al.  Biomechanical modeling of English /r/ variants. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Tara McAllister Byun,et al.  Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. , 2012, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[38]  D. Surendran,et al.  Articulatory complexity, ambient frequency, and functional load as predictors of consonant development in children. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Zhu Ming-han,et al.  Fisher linear discriminant analysis algorithm based on vector muster , 2011 .

[40]  Other Contributors Are Indicated Where They Contribute Python Software Foundation , 2017 .