Dephosphorylation of phosphotyrosine on STAT1 dimers requires extensive spatial reorientation of the monomers facilitated by the N-terminal domain.

We report experiments that infer a radical reorientation of tyrosine-phosphorylated parallel STAT1 dimers to an antiparallel form. Such a change in structure allows easy access to a phosphatase. With differentially epitope-tagged molecules, we show that the two monomers of a dimer remain together during dephosphorylation although they most likely undergo spatial reorientation. Extensive single amino acid mutagenesis within crystallographically established domains, manipulation of amino acids in an unstructured tether that connects the N-terminal domain (ND) to the core of the protein, and the demonstration that overexpressed ND can facilitate dephosphorylation of a core molecule lacking an ND all support this model: When the tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT1 disengages from DNA, the ND dimerizes and somehow assists in freeing the reciprocal pY-SH2 binding between the monomers of the dimer while ND ND dimerization persists. The core of the monomers rotate allowing reciprocal association of the coiled:coil and DNA-binding domains to present pY at the two ends of an antiparallel dimer for ready dephosphorylation.

[1]  S. Becker,et al.  Structure of the Unphosphorylated STAT5a Dimer* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  K. Shuai,et al.  Regulation of gene-activation pathways by PIAS proteins in the immune system , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[3]  J. Darnell,et al.  Structural bases of unphosphorylated STAT1 association and receptor binding. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[4]  J. Darnell,et al.  Implications of an antiparallel dimeric structure of nonphosphorylated STAT1 for the activation-inactivation cycle. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Witkowski,et al.  Effect of modification of the length and flexibility of the acyl carrier protein-thioesterase interdomain linker on functionality of the animal fatty acid synthase. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[6]  C. Müller,et al.  Structure of an activated Dictyostelium STAT in its DNA-unbound form. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[7]  W. Alexander,et al.  The role of suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins in regulation of the immune response. , 2004, Annual review of immunology.

[8]  J. C. Evans,et al.  Structures of the N-terminal modules imply large domain motions during catalysis by methionine synthase. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  D. Fremont,et al.  N-domain–dependent nonphosphorylated STAT4 dimers required for cytokine-driven activation , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[10]  C. Schindler,et al.  STATs Dimerize in the Absence of Phosphorylation* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  S. Harrison,et al.  Variation on an Src-like Theme , 2003, Cell.

[12]  John Kuriyan,et al.  A reinterpretation of the dimerization interface of the N‐terminal Domains of STATs , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  Jaap Heringa,et al.  An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[14]  J. Darnell Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[15]  J. ten Hoeve,et al.  Identification of a Nuclear Stat1 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  A. Brivanlou,et al.  Signal Transduction and the Control of Gene Expression , 2002, Science.

[17]  R. Gourse,et al.  UPs and downs in bacterial transcription initiation: the role of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  D. Shalloway,et al.  A phosphotyrosine displacement mechanism for activation of Src by PTPα , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[19]  C. Khosla,et al.  Role of linkers in communication between protein modules. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[20]  V. Fried,et al.  Cellular Physiology of STAT3: Where’s the Cytoplasmic Monomer?* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  J E Darnell,et al.  A nuclear protein tyrosine phosphatase is required for the inactivation of Stat1. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Bernd Groner,et al.  TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STAT3B/DNA COMPLEX , 1999 .

[23]  C. Schindler,et al.  Amino-terminal Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) Domains Regulate Nuclear Translocation and STAT Deactivation* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  S. Becker,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the Stat3β homodimer bound to DNA , 1998, Nature.

[25]  R. Simpson,et al.  STAT3 forms stable homodimers in the presence of divalent cations prior to activation. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[26]  J. Darnell,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Tyrosine Phosphorylated STAT-1 Dimer Bound to DNA , 1998, Cell.

[27]  J. Darnell,et al.  Structure of the amino-terminal protein interaction domain of STAT-4. , 1998, Science.

[28]  J. Darnell,et al.  The rapid inactivation of nuclear tyrosine phosphorylated Stat1 depends upon a protein tyrosine phosphatase. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[29]  K. Shuai,et al.  Enhancement of antiproliferative activity of gamma interferon by the specific inhibition of tyrosine dephosphorylation of Stat1 , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[30]  J. Darnell,et al.  Interferon activation of the transcription factor Stat91 involves dimerization through SH2-phosphotyrosyl peptide interactions , 1994, Cell.

[31]  Andrew Ziemiecki,et al.  Polypeptide signalling to the nucleus through tyrosine phosphorylation of Jak and Stat proteins , 1993, Nature.

[32]  S. Becker,et al.  Structure of the Unphosphorylated STAT 5 a Dimer * □ , 2005 .

[33]  Yu-Rong Fu,et al.  Identification of a Nuclear Stat 1 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase , 2002 .

[34]  Vahe Bandarian,et al.  Domain alternation switches B12-dependent methionine synthase to the activation conformation , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  C. Khosla,et al.  Modular enzymes , 2001, Nature.

[36]  G. Stark,et al.  Biomolecular interaction analysis of IFN gamma-induced signaling events in whole-cell lysates: prevalence of latent STAT1 in high-molecular weight complexes. , 1998, Growth factors.

[37]  S. Taylor,et al.  Domain movements in protein kinases. , 1994, Current opinion in structural biology.