Developing service research – paving the way to transdisciplinary research

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss how service, as an interdisciplinary area of research, can increase its potential for transdisciplinary contributions from the perspective of what signifies intra-, multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary research. Design/methodology/approach – The essay first discusses common perspectives on the service concept before presenting a review on what signifies intra-, multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary research. The emerging theoretical framework is followed by a discussion on the challenges and opportunities for service research in making interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary theoretical contributions. Findings – The research provides a typological framework for understanding intra-, multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary service research and, implications related to how service research contributions can become increasingly inter- and transdisciplinary. Originality/value – The paper contributes to widening the scope of service research by focussing on how ...

[1]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Has Management Studies Lost its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research , 2013 .

[2]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[3]  J. Klein,et al.  Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators , 2010 .

[4]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[6]  J. Brudney,et al.  Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept , 1983 .

[7]  C. Grönroos.  Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis , 2011 .

[8]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[9]  C. Grönroos,et al.  The service revolution and its marketing implications: service logic vs service-dominant logic , 2014 .

[10]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Relational Bureaucracy: Structuring Reciprocal Relationships into Roles , 2012 .

[11]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service , 2010 .

[12]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[13]  C. Grönroos.  Service Management and Marketing: Customer Management in Service Competition , 2007 .

[14]  E. Ostrom,et al.  CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1981 .

[15]  Michaela Lipkin,et al.  Customer experience formation in today’s service landscape , 2016 .

[16]  G. D. N. Worswick,et al.  The Service Economy. , 1969 .

[17]  Hille C. Bruns,et al.  Working Alone Together: Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise , 2013 .

[18]  Richard L. Priem.  A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation , 2007 .

[19]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[20]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[21]  A. Biglan.  Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .

[22]  P. Rosenfield,et al.  The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[23]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[24]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .

[25]  L. J. Grigg.  Cross Disciplinary Research , 1999 .

[26]  David Knights,et al.  The Hype and Hope of Interdisciplinary Management Studies , 1997 .

[27]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[28]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[29]  Brayden G. King,et al.  The Practice of Theory Borrowing in Organizational Studies: Current Issues and Future Directions , 2009 .

[30]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  The Challenges of Building Theory by Combining Lenses , 2011 .

[31]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[32]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . , 2011 .

[33]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[34]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach , 2011 .

[35]  Zoe Radnor,et al.  A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach , 2013 .

[36]  E. Ostrom.  Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .

[37]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Transformative Service Research: An Agenda for the Future , 2013 .

[38]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Service portraits in service research: a critical review , 2005 .

[39]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[40]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Governance and global communities , 2005 .

[41]  David E. Bowen,et al.  Interdisciplinary study of service: Some progress, some prospects , 1990 .

[42]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[43]  L. Donaldson.  The Weick Stuff: Managing Beyond Games , 1992 .

[44]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[45]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Nothing Is Quite So Practical as a Good Theory , 1989 .