The effects of substrate and vertebral number on locomotion in the garter snake Thamnophis elegans

1. Locomotor performance of limbless vertebrates depends on the substrate through which individuals move and may result in selection on vertebral number in different habitats. To evaluate the effect of push-point density on snake locomotion, the density of vegetation and other potential push-points was quantified at two sites in California (coastal and inland), where conspecific snakes differed greatly in vertebral number (230 and 256 average total vertebrae, respectively; Arnold 1988). The coastal site had significantly higher push-point densities than the inland site. 2. Five experimental push-point densities that fell within the natural range of push-point densities were employed in laboratory trials of juvenile snake locomotion. Density of push-points significantly affected both crawling speed and head-to-tail distance (HTD), an indirect measure of lateral bending. The fastest speed was achieved at an intermediate push-point density. The shortest HTD occurred when snakes moved through the lowest push-point density. 3. Sex, total number of vertebrae and total length significantly affected HTD, regardless of push-point density. Snakes with relatively more vertebrae had a shorter HTD, suggesting they were able to achieve greater lateral bending than snakes with fewer vertebrae. Coastal and inland populations did not differ in HTD during locomotion. 4. Numbers of body and tail vertebrae significantly influenced speed at different push-point densities. In general, snakes with more body vertebrae were slower than those with fewer, while snakes with more tail vertebrae were faster than those with fewer. Snakes of greater total length were faster at all densities. Coastal snakes crawled faster than inland snakes at all push-point densities.

[1]  J. D. Davis,et al.  Kinematics and Performance Capacity for the Concertina Locomotion of a Snake (Coluber Constrictor) , 1991 .

[2]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  SELECTION ON LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE CAPACITY IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF GARTER SNAKES , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  C. A. Pell,et al.  The horizontal septum: Mechanisms of force transfer in locomotion of scombrid fishes (Scombridae, Perciformes) , 1993, Journal of morphology.

[4]  J. Merilä,et al.  Variation in number of ventral scales in snakes: effects on body size, growth rate and survival in the adder, Vipera berus , 1993 .

[5]  E. Dunn Survival Value of Varietal Characters in Snakes , 1942, The American Naturalist.

[6]  James C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[7]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[8]  Carl Gans,et al.  How Snakes Move , 1970 .

[9]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  The effect of tail morphology on locomotor performance of snakes: A comparison of experimental and correlative methods , 1989 .

[10]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[11]  Carl Cans,et al.  LOCOMOTION OF LIMBLESS VERTEBRATES: PATTERN AND EVOLUTION , 1986 .

[12]  S. Bennet,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Speed of Snakes as a Function of Peg Spacing , 1974 .

[13]  R. Inger Further Notes on Differential Selection of Variant Juvenile Snakes , 1943, The American Naturalist.

[14]  R. Inger Differential Selection of Variant Juvenile Snakes , 1942, The American Naturalist.

[15]  P. Munz,et al.  A California Flora , 1960 .

[16]  A. Blight THE MUSCULAR CONTROL OF VERTEBRATE SWIMMING MOVEMENTS , 1977 .

[17]  B. Jayne Swimming in constricting (Elaphe g. guttata) and nonconstricting (Nerodia fasciata pictiventris) colubrid snakes , 1985 .

[18]  B. Jayne,et al.  Muscular mechanisms of snake locomotion: An electromyographic study of lateral undulation of the florida banded water snake (Nerodia fasciata) and the yellow rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta) , 1988, Journal of morphology.

[19]  L. Lindell The evolution of vertebral number and body size in snakes , 1994 .

[20]  S. J. Arnold BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. I. PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CHEMORECEPTIVE RESPONSES TO PREY IN THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  C. Heckrotte Relations of Body Temperature, Size, and Crawling Speed of the Common Garter Snake, Thamnophis s. sirtalis , 1967 .

[22]  F. Clarac,et al.  Propulsive action of a snake pushing against a single site: Its combined analysis , 1989, Journal of morphology.

[23]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Behavioural variation in natural populations. V. Morphological correlates of locomotion in the garter snake (Thamnophis radix) , 1988 .

[24]  J. Gray The mechanism of locomotion in snakes. , 1946, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  C. C. Lindsey Pleomerism, the Widespread Tendency Among Related Fish Species for Vertebral Number to be Correlated with Maximum Body Length , 1975 .

[26]  H. Huynh,et al.  Conditions under Which Mean Square Ratios in Repeated Measurements Designs Have Exact F-Distributions , 1970 .

[27]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Effects of a Full Stomach on Locomotory Performance of Juvenile Garter Snakes (Thamnophis elegans) , 1983 .

[28]  Tests on locomotion of the elongate and limbless lizard Anguis fragilis (Squamata: Anguidae) , 1990 .

[29]  C. A. Pell,et al.  Mechanical control of swimming speed: stiffness and axial wave form in undulating fish models , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  B. Jayne Comparative morphology of the semispinalis‐spinalis muscle of snakes and correlations with locomotion and constriction , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[31]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .