Queueing Network Modeling of Mental Architecture, Response Time, and Response Accuracy: Reflected Multidimensional Diffusions

Response time (RT) and response accuracy are two of the most commonly used performance measures in cognitive psychology and studies of cognitive architecture. This paper examines the relationship and establishes a bridge between two currently separated groups of mathematical models of RT: models of RT and mental architecture and models of RT and accuracy. The bridge, called QN-RMD, is established by extending the queueing network (QN) architecture model of RT (Liu, 1996), which has successfully integrated a large number of RT-architecture models as special cases, and by representing the state changes in a mental QN as Reflected Multidimensional Diffusions (RMD). More specifically, the “state” of a K-server QN mental architecture is represented as a reflected diffusion space of K dimensions, in which “reflecting barriers” represent and reveal architectural constraints, while “absorbing barriers” represent accuracyrelated response criteria, analogous to diffusion models of RT. This approach moves beyond the current 1-D diffusion models that have successfully accounted for but are limited to single-stage fast responses. 1-D diffusions can only represent the “state” of a single server system in stochastic information accumulation, not multi-server architectures. This approach extends the architectural RT models to account for accuracy, brings the diffusion/accumulator models to the architectural domain, and unifies RT/accuracy/mental architecture modeling in a larger framework.

[1]  J. Harrison,et al.  Brownian motion and stochastic flow systems , 1986 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[3]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[4]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Dynamic Models of Response Time and Accuracy: A Foundational Primer. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[5]  R. Ratcliff Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[7]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  An extension of the exemplar-based random-walk model to separable-dimension stimuli , 2003 .

[8]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[9]  R. Audley,et al.  SOME ALTERNATIVE STOCHASTIC MODELS OF CHOICE1 , 1965 .

[10]  R Ratcliff,et al.  A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[11]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[12]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[13]  Y Liu,et al.  Queueing network modeling of elementary mental processes. , 1996, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Harrison,et al.  Reflected Brownian Motion in an Orthant: Numerical Methods for Steady-State Analysis , 1992 .