Exploring the role and influence of expectations in achieving VLE benefit success

The aim of this paper is to investigate the role and influence of expectations management in realising benefit success when adopting a virtual learning environment ( VLE). Based on a discussion of findings from a further and higher education college in the UK, a conceptual expectations management model is developed that explores the factors influencing the formulation and realisation of expected benefits from a case study of VLE adoption over time (2003-2012). The importance of avoiding unrealistic expectations as well as proactive user involvement, change control, training and clearly defined pedagogical reasons for introducing a VLE are discussed. Finally, a number of key learning points, which managers and practitioners should address when adopting VLEs, are also considered, along with suggestions for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Matt Lingard Why don’t all lecturers make use of VLEs?: what can the so-called “laggards” tell us? , 2007 .

[2]  Y. Inoue Technology and Diversity in Higher Education: New Challenges , 2006 .

[3]  André Pretorius,et al.  Factors that Contribute towards Improving Learning Effectiveness Using a Specific Learning Management System (LMS) at the Military Academy (MA): A Demonstration. , 2010 .

[4]  Angelique Dimitracopoulou,et al.  The School‐Teacher's Learning Community: matters of communication analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Monica Johannesen,et al.  The role of virtual learning environments in a primary school context: An analysis of inscription of assessment practices , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Allan Martin,et al.  Digital Literacies for Learning , 2006 .

[7]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Virtual Learning Environments Through a Different Lens: Potentials of the Intermediate Space , 2010 .

[8]  K. Weick Making Sense of the Organization, Volume 2: The Impermanent Organization , 2009 .

[9]  Sheila Corrall,et al.  The subject librarian and the virtual learning environment: A study of UK universities , 2011, Program.

[10]  Sarah Mercer,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Tools for Online Pedagogy , 2009 .

[11]  Virtual learning environments : an evaluation of their development in a sample of educational settings , 2009 .

[12]  Eva Heinrich,et al.  An Investigation into E-Tool Use for Formative Assignment Assessment - Status and Recommendations , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Leonard J. Bass,et al.  Factors Influencing Industrial Practices of Software Architecture Evaluation: An Empirical Investigation , 2007, QoSA.

[14]  Cheng-Hsun Ho,et al.  Continuance Intention of e-Learning Platform: Toward an Integrated Model , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag..

[15]  D. Laurillard Digital Technologies and Their Role in Achieving Our Ambitions for Education , 2008 .

[16]  Nicole Harris The DiVLE Programme: outputs and outcomes , 2005 .

[17]  G. Kirkup,et al.  Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution , 2005 .

[18]  A. Mundkur,et al.  Bringing the Real World in: Reflection on Building a Virtual Learning Environment , 2012 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Daniel John Kennedy Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs): here to stay, or on the brink of demise? , 2009 .

[21]  Elizabeth L. Black Toolkit Approach To Integrating Library Resources Into The Learning Management System , 2008 .

[22]  D. McConnell E-Learning Groups and Communities , 2006 .

[23]  Peter Sidorko,et al.  Virtually there, almost: educational and informational possibilities in virtual worlds , 2009 .

[24]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  A temporal approach to expectations and desires from knowledge management systems , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Sue Gray,et al.  Implementing a managed learning environment in the NHS , 2009 .

[26]  Steven Warburton,et al.  Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Nicolas Lesca,et al.  Strategic scanning project failure and abandonment factors: lessons learned , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  N. Selwyn Realising the potential of new technology? Assessing the legacy of New Labour’s ICT agenda 1997–2007 , 2008 .

[29]  G. Manfro,et al.  Retrospective studies. , 2015, Advances in neurobiology.

[30]  Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos,et al.  Collaborative virtual learning environments: design and evaluation , 2009, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[31]  Ali Shiri,et al.  Integrating digital libraries and virtual learning environments , 2006 .

[32]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Having expectations of information systems benefits that match received benefits: does it really matter? , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[33]  John O'Donoghue Technology Supported Learning and Teaching: A Staff Perspective. , 2006 .

[34]  Carol W. Hsu,et al.  Frame misalignment: interpreting the implementation of information systems security certification in an organization , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Rob Procter,et al.  Virtual research environments in scholarly work and communications , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[36]  Getaneh Alemu,et al.  Integration of digital libraries and virtual learning environments: a literature review , 2009 .

[37]  Stephen Jackson,et al.  A techno-cultural emergence perspective on the management of techno-change , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[38]  Andrew Greasley,et al.  A virtual learning environment for operations management:Assessing the student's perspective , 2004 .

[39]  Steven Hornik,et al.  When Technology Does Not Support Learning: Conflicts Between Epistemological Beliefs and Technology Support in Virtual Learning Environments , 2007, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[40]  Eugenijus Kurilovas,et al.  Learning Objects and Virtual Learning Environments Technical Evaluation Criteria. , 2009 .

[41]  Heidi R. Perreault,et al.  Faculty and Student Use of Technologies, User Productivity, and User Preference in Distance Education , 2009 .

[42]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Early Warning Signs of it Project Failure: The Dominant Dozen , 2007 .

[43]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[44]  Gerda Mihhailova,et al.  E-learning as internationalization strategy in higher education: Lecturer’s and student’s perspective , 2006 .

[45]  Baiyun Chen Barriers to Adoption of Technology-Mediated Distance Education in Higher-Education Institutions , 2009 .

[46]  Stephen Jackson,et al.  Measuring and evaluating IS expectations and benefit success from B2B electronic trading: a new survey approach , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Angela Donaldson Delivering Legal Information Skills via a VLE , 2010 .

[48]  Pedro Gomis-Porqueras,et al.  New Technologies in Higher Education: Lower Attendance and Worse Learning Outcomes? , 2011 .

[49]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Stakeholder management in IOS projects: analysis of an attempt to implement an electronic patient file , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  George Philip,et al.  Managing expectations and benefits: a model for electronic trading and EDI in the insurance industry , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[51]  Christina Keller,et al.  Technology acceptance in academic organisations: implementation of virtual learning environments , 2006, ECIS.

[52]  Palitha Edirisingha,et al.  Introducing a VLE into Campus-Based Undergraduate Teaching: Staff Perspectives on Its Impact on Teaching , 2005 .

[53]  Ann Marcus-Quinn,et al.  Using a Virtual Learning Environment to Manage Group Projects: A Case Study , 2008 .

[54]  Stephen Jackson,et al.  Organizational culture and information systems adoption: A three-perspective approach , 2011, Inf. Organ..