Crashworthy systems: a paradigm shift in road safety design

The technology to design crashworthy vehicles has advanced considerably over the past decade. Substantial “Real World” data is being collected by both research institutions and car manufacturers for feedback to improve occupant protection. This data details vehicle deformation, site accident information and injuries sustained by occupants. Likewise complex vehicle crash tests with surrogate anthropomorphic dummies are now carried out daily. Dummy technology and the development of human injury tolerance curves are well advanced with respect to identifying life threatening head and chest injuries in a crash test. Similarly computer simulations of vehicle crashes and injuries sustained by occupants are well developed. Designers are now able to investigate different crash scenarios in detail in order to mitigate injuries in prototype vehicles well in advance of any crash testing. Impact loads and occupant kinematics can be readily obtained for design purposes. In addition to this, accident reconstruction software has advanced to the point that it is now becoming an essential tool for litigation and Coronial enquiries. Vehicle kinematics and speeds leading up to the crash event can be established using such software.

[1]  J G Viner.  THE ROADSIDE SAFETY PROBLEM , 1995 .

[2]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  THE SWEDISH 'VISION ZERO' AND HOW PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL WAS OBTAINED , 1998 .

[3]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  MADYMO modelling of a car impacting an energy absorbing rear truck underrun barrier , 1997 .

[4]  R. M. Hackett,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING OF VEHICLE CRASHES AGAINST ROADSIDE SAFETY BARRIERS , 1999 .

[5]  M H Ray,et al.  The Use of Finite Element Analysis in Roadside Hardware Design , 1996 .

[6]  G Rechnitzer,et al.  CRASH COMPATIBILITY OF TRAMS , 1999 .

[7]  J A Reagan.  VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY WITH ROADSIDE SAFETY HARDWARE , 1995 .

[8]  J. Wekezer,et al.  Design flaws and structural retrofit analysis of existing BCT terminals , 1999 .

[9]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF FATAL SINGLE VEHICLE CRASHES , 1997 .

[10]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  MADYMO COMPUTER MODELLING OF ENERGY ABSORBING REAR UNDERRUN BARRIERS FOR HEAVY VEHICLES: A PILOT STUDY , 1997 .

[11]  Mary Lay,et al.  Ways of the world : a history of the world's roads and of the vehicles that used them , 1992 .

[12]  F. Winston,et al.  Biomechanical epidemiology: a new approach to injury control research. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  John D. Reid.  TRACKING THE ENERGY IN AN ENERGY ABSORBING GUARDRAIL TERMINAL , 1998 .

[14]  G Rechnitzer.  TRUCK INVOLVED CRASH STUDY: FATAL AND INJURY CRASHES OF CARS AND OTHER ROAD USERS WITH THE FRONT AND SIDES OF HEAVY VEHICLES , 1993 .

[15]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  Optimal side impact protection , 1998 .

[16]  Chris Powell,et al.  Development and testing of energy absorbing rear underrun barriers for heavy vehicles , 1996 .

[17]  R L Huston,et al.  Validation of an Analytical Model of a Right-Angle Collision Between a Vehicle and a Fixed, Rigid Object , 1998 .

[18]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  THE USE OF BIOMECHANICAL INJURY COST MODELS IN ASSESSING SIDE-IMPACT COUNTERMEASURES , 1997 .

[19]  G Rechnitzer,et al.  TRUCK INVOLVED CRASH STUDY - REPORT ON: FATAL AND INJURY CRASHES OF CARS INTO THE REAR OF TRUCKS , 1991 .