Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks

The paper provides an exploratory analysis of the research networks linking scientists working in an open science environment, and researchers involved in the private technology domain. The study combines data on scientific co-authorship with data on patent co-invention, at the level of individual researchers, for three science-intensive technology fields, i.e. lasers, semiconductors and biotechnology, in order to assess the extent of the overlap between the two communities and to identify the role of key individuals in the process of knowledge transfer. Our findings reveal that the extent of the connectedness among scientists and inventors is rather large, and that particular individuals, i.e. authors-inventors, who act as gatekeepers and bridge the boundaries between the two domains, are fundamental to ensuring this connectivity. These individuals tend to occupy prominent positions in the scientific and the technological networks. However, our results also show maintaining a very central position in the scientific network may come at the expense of being able to fill a similarly central position in a technological network (and vice versa). Finally, preliminary analysis of the institutional origins of authors-inventors shows that one characteristic, distinctive of Europe compared to the United States, is associated with the relatively lower involvement of corporate scientists at the intersection between the two worlds of science and technology.

[1]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .

[3]  Francis Narin,et al.  Is technology becoming science? , 1985, Scientometrics.

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[5]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .

[6]  S. Breschi,et al.  THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .

[7]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives , 1999 .

[8]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[9]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors , 2008 .

[10]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006 .

[11]  J. Brada,et al.  Economic Reform in Hungary: An Overview and Assessment , 1989 .

[12]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[13]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Yoshiaki Ogura,et al.  Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations , 2005 .

[15]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[16]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size , 2007 .

[17]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[18]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[19]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Organization of Economic Innovation in Europe , 1999 .

[20]  Fiona E. Murray Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[21]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[22]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[23]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[24]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[25]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[26]  Philippe Ducor,et al.  Coauthorship and Coinventorship , 2000, Science.

[27]  Olle Persson,et al.  Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties , 1995, Scientometrics.

[28]  M. Newman 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[29]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Patents and Publications , 2004 .

[30]  P. Patel,et al.  University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends , 2003 .

[31]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[32]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[33]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents , 2006, Scientometrics.

[34]  R. Tijssen Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[35]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[37]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[38]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Patent Production at a European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level , 2006 .

[39]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets , 2004 .

[40]  E. Kandel,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. Meyer,et al.  Are patenting scientists the better scholars? , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2005..

[42]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[43]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities , 1994, Scientometrics.

[44]  Neus Palomeras Markets for Inventors: Examining Mobility Patterns of Engineers in the Semiconductor Industry , 2004 .

[45]  D. Hicks Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[46]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[47]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis , 2001 .

[48]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology , 2007 .

[49]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Performance Effects of (In)Direct Industry Science Links , 2008 .

[50]  Jw Kim Comment: University patenting and scientific productivity , 2008 .

[51]  Akira Goto,et al.  The role of corporate scientists in innovation , 2006 .

[52]  B. Looy The Role of Entrepreneurial Universities within Innovation Systems: An Overview and Assessment , 2009 .

[53]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  "Cross-firm" Inventors and Social Networks: Localized Knowledge Spillovers Revisited , 2010 .

[54]  P. David,et al.  The research network and the new economics of science: from metaphors to organisational behaviours , 1998 .

[55]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge?: Global trends in the output of corporate research articles , 2004 .

[56]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[58]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .

[59]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .

[60]  F. Lissoni,et al.  Inventorship and Authorship in Patent-Publication Pairs: an Enquiry into the Economics of Scientific Credit , 2008 .

[61]  G. Dosi,et al.  The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .

[62]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[63]  Kira Fabrizio,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .

[64]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[65]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[66]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  M. Meyer Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[68]  E. Mansfield Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[69]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[70]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[71]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..