Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Martin Meyer,et al. Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006, Scientometrics.
[2] Andrea Vezzulli,et al. If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .
[3] Francis Narin,et al. Is technology becoming science? , 1985, Scientometrics.
[4] W. Powell,et al. To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .
[5] Michael R. Darby,et al. Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .
[6] S. Breschi,et al. THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA , 2007 .
[7] Paula E. Stephan,et al. Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives , 1999 .
[8] Ulrich Schmoch,et al. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.
[9] Stefano Breschi,et al. University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors , 2008 .
[10] Martin Meyer,et al. Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology , 2006 .
[11] J. Brada,et al. Economic Reform in Hungary: An Overview and Assessment , 1989 .
[12] Waverly W. Ding,et al. The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .
[13] Lee Fleming,et al. Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..
[14] Yoshiaki Ogura,et al. Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations , 2005 .
[15] Stanley Wasserman,et al. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.
[16] L. Bettencourt,et al. Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size , 2007 .
[17] Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al. Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .
[18] Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .
[19] Franco Malerba,et al. The Organization of Economic Innovation in Europe , 1999 .
[20] Fiona E. Murray. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .
[21] Marie C. Thursby,et al. Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .
[22] Pablo D'Este,et al. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .
[23] Jacques Michel,et al. Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.
[24] Michael R. Darby,et al. GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .
[25] P. David,et al. Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .
[26] Philippe Ducor,et al. Coauthorship and Coinventorship , 2000, Science.
[27] Olle Persson,et al. Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties , 1995, Scientometrics.
[28] M. Newman. 1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .
[29] Michel Zitt,et al. Patents and Publications , 2004 .
[30] P. Patel,et al. University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends , 2003 .
[31] M. Trajtenberg,et al. Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[32] I. Cockburn,et al. Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .
[33] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents , 2006, Scientometrics.
[34] R. Tijssen. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .
[35] M. Newman,et al. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .
[37] B. Kogut,et al. Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .
[38] Patrick Llerena,et al. Patent Production at a European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level , 2006 .
[39] S. Breschi,et al. Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets , 2004 .
[40] E. Kandel,et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[41] M. Meyer,et al. Are patenting scientists the better scholars? , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2005..
[42] Paula E. Stephan,et al. Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .
[43] Hildrun Kretschmer,et al. Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities , 1994, Scientometrics.
[44] Neus Palomeras. Markets for Inventors: Examining Mobility Patterns of Engineers in the Semiconductor Industry , 2004 .
[45] D. Hicks. Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .
[46] Olle Persson,et al. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.
[47] Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al. The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis , 2001 .
[48] Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al. Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology , 2007 .
[49] Reinhilde Veugelers,et al. In Search of Performance Effects of (In)Direct Industry Science Links , 2008 .
[50] Jw Kim. Comment: University patenting and scientific productivity , 2008 .
[51] Akira Goto,et al. The role of corporate scientists in innovation , 2006 .
[52] B. Looy. The Role of Entrepreneurial Universities within Innovation Systems: An Overview and Assessment , 2009 .
[53] Stefano Breschi,et al. "Cross-firm" Inventors and Social Networks: Localized Knowledge Spillovers Revisited , 2010 .
[54] P. David,et al. The research network and the new economics of science: from metaphors to organisational behaviours , 1998 .
[55] Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al. Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge?: Global trends in the output of corporate research articles , 2004 .
[56] Michelle Gittelman,et al. Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..
[57] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.
[58] Patrick Llerena,et al. Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .
[59] Koenraad Debackere,et al. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? , 2006 .
[60] F. Lissoni,et al. Inventorship and Authorship in Patent-Publication Pairs: an Enquiry into the Economics of Scientific Credit , 2008 .
[61] G. Dosi,et al. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’ , 2006 .
[62] Mark Newman,et al. Models of the Small World , 2000 .
[63] Kira Fabrizio,et al. Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment , 2008 .
[64] S. Breschi,et al. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .
[65] Rebecca Henderson,et al. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..
[66] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[67] M. Meyer. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .
[68] E. Mansfield. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .
[69] David L. Deeds,et al. An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .
[70] Robin Cowan,et al. Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .
[71] Jasjit Singh,et al. Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..