This article reports the research findings of the relationships of personality variables and preferences for modes of conflict resolution. Eleven hypotheses were developed relating nine personality variables-achievement, dominance, aggression, affiliation, deference, succorance, nurturance, dogmatism, and Machiavellianism-to the preference for smoothing, forcing and confronting. These hypotheses were tested using a sample of 136 MBA students and support was found for eight hypotheses. As hypothesized positive correlations were found between the following variables: affiliation-smoothing, deference-forcing, succorance-smoothing, nurturance-smoothing, dogmatism-confronting, and Machiavellianism-confronting. Support was also found for two hypothesized negative correlations: affiliation-forcing and Machiavellianism-smoothing. No support was found for the hypotheses relating achievement to confronting, dominance to forcing, and aggression to forcing.
[1]
P. Lawrence,et al.
Organization and environment
,
1967
.
[2]
K. Thomas.
Toward Multi-Dimensional Values in Teaching: The Example of Conflict Behaviors
,
1977
.
[3]
R. Blakeney,et al.
Personality Correlates of Conflict Resolution Modes
,
1977
.
[4]
M. Rokeach,et al.
The nature and meaning of dogmatism.
,
1954,
Psychological review.
[5]
Bruce Quarrington,et al.
Edwards Personal Preference Schedule
,
1956
.
[6]
R. Christie,et al.
Studies in Machiavellianism
,
1970
.