Relative contributions of organ shape and receptor arrangement to the design of cricket’s cercal system

Understanding the relative contributions of the shape of a sensory organ and the arrangement of receptors to the overall performance of the organ has long been a challenge for sensory biologists. We tackled this issue using the wind-sensing system of crickets, the cerci, two conical abdominal appendages covered with arrays of filiform hairs. Scanning electron microscopy coupled with 3D reconstruction methods were used for mapping of all cercal filiform hairs. The hairs are arranged according to their diameter in a way that avoids collisions with neighbours during hair deflection: long hairs are regularly spaced, whereas short hairs are both randomly and densely distributed. Particle image velocimetry showed that the variation in diameter of the cercus along its length modifies the pattern of fluid velocities. Hairs are subject to higher air flow amplitudes at the base than at the apex of the cercus. The relative importance of interactions between receptors and the air flow around the organ may explain the performance of the cricket’s cercal system: it is characterised by a high density of statistically non-interacting short hairs located at the base of the cercus where sensitivity to air currents is the highest.

[1]  A. Caputi,et al.  Electroreception in Gymnotus carapo: pre-receptor processing and the distribution of electroreceptor types. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  Tateo Shimozawa,et al.  The aerodynamics and sensory physiology of range fractionation in the cereal filiform sensilla of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  I. Johnsen,et al.  Boundary Layer Flow near a Cylindrical Obstacle in an Oscillating Incompressible Fluid , 1954 .

[4]  Jürgen Tautz,et al.  Ultrastructure and mechanical properties of an insect mechanoreceptor: Stimulus-transmitting structures and sensory apparatus of the cereal filiform hairs of Gryllus , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[5]  F. Feldmann,et al.  Optical Measurements: Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn , 2002 .

[6]  Jürgen Tautz,et al.  Caterpillars detect flying wasps by hairs sensitive to airborne vibration , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  W. Yost.  Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction , 1977 .

[8]  S. Sheather,et al.  Testing for Spatial Correlation in Nonstationary Binary Data, with Application to Aberrant Crypt Foci in Colon Carcinogenesis , 2003, Biometrics.

[9]  W. Hodos,et al.  Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation , 2005 .

[10]  Jérôme Casas,et al.  Hair canopy of cricket sensory system tuned to predator signals. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Aage R. Møller.  Sensory Systems: Anatomy, Physiology and Pathophysiology , 2002 .

[12]  W. Merzkirch.  Particle Image Velocimetry , 2001 .

[13]  Jeffrey M. Camhi,et al.  The escape behavior of the cockroachPeriplaneta americana , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Interactive Spatial Data Analysis , 1995 .

[15]  J. Kaas,et al.  Somatosensory fovea in the star‐nosed mole: Behavioral use of the star in relation to innervation patterns and cortical representation , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[17]  Tomás Gedeon,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[18]  Brice Bathellier,et al.  Viscosity-mediated motion coupling between pairs of trichobothria on the leg of the spider Cupiennius salei , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  J. Bacon,et al.  Receptive fields of cricket giant interneurones are related to their dendritic structure. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J Palka,et al.  The cerci and abdominal giant fibres of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. I. Anatomy and physiology of normal adults , 1974, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  J Casas,et al.  Ontogeny of air-motion sensing in cricket , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  van Marie-Colette Lieshout,et al.  Indices of Dependence Between Types in Multivariate Point Patterns , 1999 .

[23]  W. Gnatzy,et al.  Digger wasp against crickets. II. An airborne signal produced by a running predator , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  Chang-Yi Wang,et al.  On high-frequency oscillatory viscous flows , 1968, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[26]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  The Physics of Arthropod Medium-Flow Sensitive Hairs: Biological Models for Artificial Sensors , 2003 .

[27]  C. U. Smith.  Biology of Sensory Systems , 2000 .

[28]  G. Jacobs,et al.  Direction sensitivity of the filiform hair population of the cricket cereal system , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  Tateo Shimozawa,et al.  Cricket Wind Receptors: Thermal Noise for the Highest Sensitivity Known , 2003 .

[30]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[31]  F. Theunissen,et al.  Functional organization of a neural map in the cricket cercal sensory system , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  Tateo Shimozawa,et al.  Varieties of filiform hairs: range fractionation by sensory afferents and cereal interneurons of a cricket , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[33]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  Anatomy of the Regional Differences in the Eye of the Mantis Ciulfina , 1979 .

[34]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Dynamics of Arthropod Filiform Hairs. I. Mathematical Modelling of the Hair and Air Motions , 1993 .

[35]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[36]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (5th Edition) , 1984 .

[37]  G. Manley,et al.  Evolution of the Vertebrate Auditory System , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[38]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Medium Flow-Sensing Hairs: Biomechanics and Models , 2007 .

[39]  Rodney K. Murphey,et al.  Positional information, compartments, and the cercal sensory system of crickets , 1986 .

[40]  D. Lim,et al.  Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review , 1986, Hearing Research.

[41]  W. Gnatzy,et al.  Digger wasp vs. Cricket: (Neuro-) biology of a predator-prey-interaction , 2001 .

[42]  F. Mayinger,et al.  Optical measurements : techniques and applications , 2001 .

[43]  M. B. Wiley,et al.  Lobster Sniffing: Antennule Design and Hydrodynamic Filtering of Information in an Odor Plume , 2001, Science.

[44]  F. Barth,et al.  Sensors and Sensing in Biology and Engineering , 2003, Springer Vienna.

[45]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[46]  I. Johnsen,et al.  Errata: Boundary Layer Flow Near a Cylindrical Obstacle in an Oscillating, Incompressible Fluid [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 26 (1954)] , 1955 .

[47]  F. Barth,et al.  A Spider’s World: Senses and Behavior , 2001 .

[48]  J Casas,et al.  Air-flow sensitive hairs: boundary layers in oscillatory flows around arthropod appendages , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.