Effects of posture and vibration magnitude on apparent mass and pelvis rotation during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration

Abstract The effect of variations in posture and vibration magnitude on apparent mass and seat-to-pelvis pitch transmissibility have been studied with vertical random vibration over the frequency range 1·0–20 Hz. Each of 12 subjects was exposed to 27 combinations of three vibration magnitudes (0·2, 1·0 and 2·0m/s2 r.m.s.) and nine sitting postures (“upright”, “anterior lean”, “posterior lean”, “kyphotic”, “back-on”, “pelvis support”, “inverted SIT-BAR” (increased pressure beneath ischial tuberosities), “bead cushion” (decreased pressure beneath ischial tuberosities) and “belt” (wearing an elasticated belt)). Peaks in the apparent masses were observed at about 5 and 10 Hz, and in the seat-to-pelvis pitch transmissibilities at about 12 Hz. In all postures, the resonance frequencies in the apparent mass and transmissibility decreased with increased vibration magnitude, indicating a non-linear softening system. There were only small changes in apparent mass or transmissibility with posture, although peaks were lower for the apparent mass in the “kyphotic” posture and were lower for the transmissibility in the “belt” posture. The changes in apparent mass and transmissibility caused by changes in vibration magnitude were greater than the changes caused by variation in posture.

[1]  L. Wei,et al.  THE PREDICITON OF SEAT TRANSMISSIBILITY FROM MEASURES OF SEAT IMPEDANCE , 1998 .

[2]  M. H. Pope,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE BIOMECHANICS AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF WORKING POSTURES (IT ISN'T ALWAYS VIBRATION WHICH IS TO BLAME!) , 1998 .

[3]  M. Griffin,et al.  A data correction method for surface measurement of vibration on the human body. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  M. Griffin,et al.  Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  N J Mansfield,et al.  The apparent mass of the human body exposed to non-orthogonal horizontal vibration. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Toshisuke Miwa MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE OF HUMAN BODY IN VARIOUS POSTURES , 1975 .

[7]  J Sandover Modelling human responses to vibration. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  L. Claes,et al.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. , 1999, Spine.

[9]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THE STANDING HUMAN BODY EXPOSED TO VERTICAL VIBRATION: INFLUENCE OF POSTURE AND VIBRATION MAGNITUDE , 1998 .

[10]  Michael J Griffin,et al.  Non-linear characteristics in the dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Suzanne D. Smith Nonlinear Resonance Behavior in the Human Exposed to Whole-Body Vibration , 1994 .

[12]  M J Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body: vertical vibration. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  EFFECT OF MUSCLE TENSION ON NON-LINEARITIES IN THE APPARENT MASSES OF SEATED SUBJECTS EXPOSED TO VERTICAL WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION , 2002 .

[14]  H Dupuis,et al.  A reanalysis of spinal motion during vibration. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[15]  S. Kikuchi,et al.  In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. , 1999, Spine.

[16]  M. Griffin,et al.  Resonance behaviour of the seated human body and effects of posture. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.