Automatic gesture analysis using constant affine velocity

Hand human gesture recognition has been an important research topic widely studied around the world, as this field offers the ability to identify, recognize, and analyze human gestures in order to control devices or to interact with computer interfaces. In particular, in medical training, this approach is an important tool that can be used to obtain an objective evaluation of a procedure performance. In this paper, some obstetrical gestures, acquired by a forceps, were studied with the hypothesis that, as the scribbling and drawing movements, they obey the one-sixth power law, an empirical relationship which connects path curvature, torsion, and euclidean velocity. Our results show that obstetrical gestures have a constant affine velocity, which is different for each type of gesture and based on this idea this quantity is proposed as an appropriate classification feature in the hand human gesture recognition field.

[1]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Complex unconstrained three-dimensional hand movement and constant equi-affine speed. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A. A. Handzel,et al.  Geometric Methods in the Study of Human Motor Control , 1999 .

[3]  T. Flash,et al.  Models of Motor Adaptation and Impedance Control in Human Arm Movements , 1997 .

[4]  A. A. Handzel,et al.  Three-dimensional arm movements at constant equi-affine speed , 2009, Cortex.

[5]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Arm trajectory and representation of movement processing in motor cortical activity , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Tanneguy Redarce,et al.  A new learning method for obstetric gestures using the BirthSIM simulator , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  P Viviani,et al.  Segmentation and coupling in complex movements. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  R. Eagleson,et al.  Measurement of the 2D affine Lie group parameters for visual motion analysis. , 1992, Spatial vision.

[11]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Neural representations of kinematic laws of motion: Evidence for action-perception coupling , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Tanneguy Redarce,et al.  Why and how to objectively evaluate medical gestures , 2013 .

[13]  G. Sapiro,et al.  Constant Affine Velocity Predicts the 1 3 Power Law of Planar Motion Perception and Generation , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  P Viviani,et al.  The Relationship between Curvature and Velocity in Two-Dimensional Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[16]  M.T. Pham,et al.  Three-dimensional gesture comparison using curvature analysis of position and orientation , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[17]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[18]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Relationship between velocity and curvature of a human locomotor trajectory , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  Paolo Viviani,et al.  Do Units of Motor Action Really Exist , 1986 .