Behavioral implications of providing real incentives in stated choice experiments
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Loureiro,et al. Interviewer Effects on the Valuation of Goods with Ethical and Environmental Attributes , 2003 .
[2] Kenneth Train,et al. Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space , 2005 .
[3] Michel Bierlaire,et al. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .
[4] David A. Hensher,et al. The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .
[5] Patricia A. Champ,et al. Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment , 2010, Land Economics.
[6] W. Adamowicz,et al. Does Choice Context Affect the Results from Incentive‐Compatible Experiments? The Case of Non‐GM and Country‐of‐Origin Premia in Canola Oil , 2009 .
[7] Arne Risa Hole,et al. Inferred vs Stated Attribute Non-Attendance in Choice Experiments: A Study of Doctors' Prescription Behaviour , 2012 .
[8] K. Train,et al. On the Similarity of Classical and Bayesian Estimates of Individual Mean Partworths , 2000 .
[9] Peter Martinsson,et al. Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .
[10] M. Loureiro,et al. Are Valuations from Nonhypothetical Choice Experiments Different from Those of Experimental Auctions? , 2011 .
[11] K. Lancaster. A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.
[12] Cheryl L. Asmus,et al. A Comparison of Actual and Hypothetical Willingness to Pay of Parents and Non-Parents for Protecting Infant Health: The Case of Nitrates in Drinking Water , 2009, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
[13] David A. Hensher,et al. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes , 2004 .
[14] K. Train,et al. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns , 1998 .
[15] David A. Hensher,et al. Making use of respondent reported processing information to understand attribute importance: a latent variable scaling approach , 2013 .
[16] O. Johansson-Stenman,et al. Self-image and valuation of moral goods: Stated versus actual willingness to pay , 2012 .
[17] Marshall W. Van Alstyne,et al. An Economic Response to Unsolicited Communication , 2005 .
[18] K. Willis,et al. Valuing externalities from water supply: Status quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments , 2007 .
[19] C. L. Mallows,et al. Individual Choice Behaviour. , 1961 .
[20] K. Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .
[21] James J. Murphy,et al. A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .
[22] George A. Akerlof,et al. Economics and Identity , 2000 .
[23] T. Schroeder,et al. Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .
[24] D. McFadden. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .
[25] Sidney J. Levy,et al. Intepreting Consumer Mythology: A Structural Approach to Consumer Behavior , 1981 .
[26] John M. Rose,et al. Simplifying choice through attribute preservation or non-attendance: Implications for willingness to pay , 2009 .
[27] Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al. Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments , 2005 .
[28] Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .
[29] M. Thiene,et al. Using Flexible Taste Distributions to Value Collective Reputation for Environmentally Friendly Production Methods , 2008 .
[30] J. Meyerhoff,et al. A Meta-study Investigating the Sources of Protest Behaviour in Stated Preference Surveys , 2013, Environmental and Resource Economics.
[31] Riccardo Scarpa,et al. Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments , 2008 .
[32] Carsten Lynge Jensen,et al. Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments , 2011 .
[33] Danny Campbell,et al. Response latency in stated choice experiments: impact on preference, variance and processing heterogeneity , 2012 .
[34] David A. Hensher,et al. Using Conditioning on Observed Choices to Retrieve Individual-Specific Attribute Processing Strategies , 2010 .
[35] David A. Hensher,et al. Attribute Processing, Heuristics, and Preference Construction in Choice Analysis , 2009 .
[36] O. Johansson-Stenman,et al. Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency , 2008 .
[37] F. Carlsson,et al. Easy come, easy go , 2012, Experimental Economics.
[38] Chengyan Yue,et al. Organic or Local? Investigating Consumer Preference for Fresh Produce Using a Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives , 2009 .
[39] K. Mayumi,et al. Reformulating the foundations of consumer choice theory and environmental valuation , 2001 .
[40] Riccardo Scarpa,et al. Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments , 2005 .
[41] Jack A. Sinden,et al. Empirical Tests Of Hypothetical Bias In Consumers' Surplus Surveys , 1988 .
[42] J. Andreoni. Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.
[43] John A. List,et al. Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-Market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2006 .
[44] Nicholas E. Flores,et al. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .
[45] Gregory L. Poe,et al. Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same? , 2002 .
[46] Dan Rigby,et al. Skew and attribute non-attendance within the bayesian mixed logit model , 2011 .
[47] J. Louviere,et al. The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models , 1993 .
[48] Robert P. Berrens,et al. Testing for Hypothetical Bias in a Choice Experiment Using a Local Public Good: Riparian Forest Restoration , 2010 .
[49] Raffaele Zanoli,et al. Inferred and Stated Attribute Non‐Attendance in Food Choice Experiments , 2013 .
[50] Choong‐Ki Lee,et al. Development of a bias ratio to examine factors influencing hypothetical bias. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.
[51] R. G. Cummings,et al. Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .
[52] Helen R. Neill,et al. Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .
[53] D. Kahneman,et al. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .
[54] Jingjing Zhang,et al. An Investigation of Individual Preferences: Consistency Across Incentives and Stability Over Time , 2012 .
[55] D. Campbell,et al. Accommodating attribute processing strategies in stated choice analysis: do respondents do what they say they do? , 2009 .
[56] John A. List,et al. Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment , 1998 .
[57] David A. Hensher,et al. Attribute Processing in Choice Experiments and Implications on Willingness to Pay , 2006 .
[58] J. Herriges,et al. Inducing Patterns of Correlation and Substitution in Repeated Logit Models of Recreation Demand , 2002 .
[59] F. Norwood,et al. How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior? , 2009 .
[60] Kevin J. Boyle,et al. Exchange Rules and the Incentive Compatibility of Choice Experiments , 2010 .
[61] Stephane Hess,et al. It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity , 2013 .
[62] Frode Alfnes,et al. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for the Color of Salmon: A Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives , 2006 .
[63] David A. Hensher,et al. Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit , 2007 .
[64] Fredrik Carlsson,et al. Dealing with Ignored Attributes in Choice Experiments on Valuation of Sweden’s Environmental Quality Objectives , 2010 .
[65] T. Brown,et al. Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics , 2003 .
[66] Jayson L. Lusk,et al. Explaining differences in real and hypothetical experimental auctions and choice experiments with personality , 2013 .