Fumihide Tanaka engagement in the practice of social robotics When a robot is social : Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic

Social roboticists design their robots to function as social agents in interaction with humans and other robots. Although we do not deny that the robot’s design features are crucial for attaining this aim, we point to the relevance of spatial organization and coordination between the robot and the humans who interact with it. We recover these interactions through an observational study of a social robotics laboratory and examine them by applying a multimodal interactional analysis to two moments of robotics practice. We describe the vital role of roboticists and of the group of preverbal infants, who are involved in a robot’s design activity, and we argue that the robot’s social character is intrinsically related to the subtleties of human interactional moves in laboratories of social robotics. This human involvement in the robot’s social agency is not simply controlled by individual will. Instead, the human–machine couplings are demanded by the situational dynamics in which the robot is lodged.

[1]  Ian R. Fasel,et al.  The RUBI project: A progress report , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Rachel Prentice,et al.  Drilling Surgeons , 2007 .

[3]  B. Latour Give me a Laboratory and 1 will raise the Word , 1983 .

[4]  M. Engelmann The Philosophical Investigations , 2013 .

[5]  Jürgen Streeck,et al.  Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning , 2009 .

[6]  John P. Sullins Artificial knowing: gender and the thinking machine , 1999, CSOC.

[7]  J S Bailey,et al.  Home-based reinforcement and the modification of pre-delinquents' classroom behavior. , 1970, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Naturally Occurring Gestures in a Human-Robot Teaching Scenario , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[9]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[10]  David R Goode,et al.  A world without words , 1994 .

[11]  Charles Goodwin Recording Human Interaction in Natural Settings , 1993 .

[12]  L. Suchman,et al.  Understanding practice: Artificial intelligence as craftwork , 1993 .

[13]  C. Peirce,et al.  Five Hundred and Eighty-Second Meeting. May 14, 1867. Monthly Meeting; On a New List of Categories , 1865 .

[14]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading , 2015 .

[15]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory , 1985 .

[16]  S. Shapin The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England , 1988, Isis.

[17]  G. Jefferson Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction , 2004 .

[18]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. , 2012 .

[19]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[21]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Laboratory Space and the Technological Complex: An Investigation of Topical Contextures , 1991, Science in Context.

[22]  Rodney A. Brooks The Cog Project , 1997 .

[23]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[24]  Steve Tillis,et al.  Toward an Aesthetics of the Puppet: Puppetry as a Theatrical Art , 1992 .

[25]  E. Goffman Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[26]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Cooperative embodied communication emerged by interactive humanoid robots , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[27]  A. Parry Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science , 1996 .

[28]  J. Weizenbaum Computer Power And Human Reason: From Judgement To Calculation , 1978 .

[29]  D. Goode Playing with my dog Katie : an ethnomethodological study of dog-human interaction , 2007 .

[30]  D. Haraway The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness , 2003 .

[31]  Jessica Riskin,et al.  The Defecating Duck, or, the Ambiguous Origins of Artificial Life , 2003, Critical Inquiry.

[32]  平澤 Social Studies of Science : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[33]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How Social Robots Will Help Us to Diagnose, Treat, and Understand Autism , 2005, ISRR.

[34]  A Dietz,et al.  Comparison of observational recordings in vivo, via mirror, and via television. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[35]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[36]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Understanding other minds : perspectives from autism , 1994 .

[37]  Eric Hauser,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation , 2006 .

[38]  Christian Heath,et al.  Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction , 2000 .

[39]  R. Coser Insulation from Observability and Types of Social Conformity , 1961 .

[40]  Pyotr Bogatyrev Czech Puppet Theatre and Russian Folk Theatre , 1999, TDR/The Drama Review.

[41]  G. Butterworth The ontogeny and phylogeny of joint visual attention. , 1991 .

[42]  T. Lenoir Was the Last Turn The Right Turn? The Semiotic Turn and A. J. Greimas , 1994 .

[43]  Javier R. Movellan,et al.  Behavior Analysis of Children's Touch on a Small Humanoid Robot: Long-term Observation at a Daily Classroom over Three Months , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[44]  S. Baron-Cohen Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. , 1991 .

[45]  Aaron V. Cicourel,et al.  The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters , 1987 .

[46]  S. Savage-Rumbaugh,et al.  Apes, Language, and the Human Mind , 1998 .

[47]  Joseph Ransdell,et al.  Peirce est-il un phénoménologue? , 1989 .

[48]  W. Banks,et al.  Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[49]  F. Merrell,et al.  Semiosis and pragmatism , 2006 .

[50]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach , 2000 .

[51]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[52]  E. Schegloff Structures of Social Action: On some gestures' relation to talk , 1985 .

[53]  J. Weizenbaum From Computer Power and Human Reason From Judgment to Calculation , 2007 .

[54]  Vicki Hearne,et al.  Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name , 1986 .

[55]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[56]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Embodied Practices of Engineering Work , 2000 .

[57]  Charles Sanders Peirce,et al.  On a New List of Categories , 2006 .

[58]  Stefan Hirschauer,et al.  The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery , 1991 .

[59]  Umberto Eco,et al.  A theory of semiotics , 1976, Advances in semiotics.

[60]  Lambros Couloubaritsis L’institution du langage selon Aristote , 1993 .

[61]  G. L. Collected Papers , 1912, Nature.

[62]  Roar Høstaker,et al.  Latour - Semiotics and Science Studies , 2005 .

[63]  M. Pollner,et al.  The social construction of unreality: a case study of a family's attribution of competence to a severely retarded child. , 1985, Family process.

[64]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Opening Pandora’s Box , 2020, Marriage Equality.

[65]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Scientific Issues Concerning Androids , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[66]  S. Hinchliffe,et al.  Where Species Meet , 2007 .

[67]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  L. Suchman Representing practice in cognitive science , 1988 .

[69]  Morana Alac,et al.  Moving Android , 2009, Social studies of science.

[70]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  Joint attention as action , 2007 .

[71]  Tim May,et al.  Analysing Interaction: Video, Ethnography and Situated Conduct , 2002 .

[72]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Getting to know each other - Artificial social intelligence for autonomous robots , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[73]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Multimodal resources for turn-taking , 2007 .

[75]  Don H. Zimmerman,et al.  “Observability” in the Interactions of Very Young Children , 2006 .

[76]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Interaction and grammar: “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists , 1996 .

[77]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Formulating the Triangle of Doom , 2007 .

[78]  R. Brooks,et al.  The cog project: building a humanoid robot , 1999 .

[79]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .