What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality

The current study examined whether desired personality influences face preference. Pairs of composite faces were made based on the faces that individuals differing in desired partner personality found most attractive. One composite represented a face most attractive to those desiring a particular trait and the other a face most attractive to those not desiring the same trait. Pairs were presented to different participants to ascertain whether the composites reflected the desired personality of the original raters. For several traits the composites did differ in perceived personality indicating that the personality desired in a partner is reflected in face preference: if a trait is desired then faces perceived to possess that trait are found more attractive than faces which do not possess that trait. These findings cast new light on the ‘‘what is beautiful is good’’ stereotype. What an individual desires in partner reflects what they consider ‘‘good’’, and they find faces reflecting these desired traits as attractive – ‘‘what is good is beautiful’’. Possessing personality traits that are attractive may be causal in making a face attractive. 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  C. Keating,et al.  Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. , 1985 .

[2]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[3]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  F. Galton.  Composite Portraits, Made by Combining Those of Many Different Persons Into a Single Resultant Figure. , 1879 .

[5]  L. Z. McArthur,et al.  Impressions of baby-faced adults. , 1984 .

[6]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Facial Resemblance in Engaged and Married Couples , 1989 .

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[8]  D. Buss,et al.  Preferences in human mate selection. , 1986 .

[9]  D. Perrett,et al.  Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder. , 2002 .

[10]  D. Buss,et al.  Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. , 1997, Journal of personality.

[11]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[12]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  D. Berry,et al.  Cross-Cultural Agreement in Perceptions of Babyfaced Adults , 1987 .

[15]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[16]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[17]  John Liggett.  THE HUMAN FACE , 2018, Professor at Large.

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits , 2006 .

[19]  Paula M. Niedenthal,et al.  Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses , 1987 .

[20]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. , 1992 .

[21]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  P. R. Kunz,et al.  Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy. , 1973, Social biology.

[23]  A. Feingold.  Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[24]  M. Dermer,et al.  When beauty may fail. , 1975 .

[25]  D. Perrett,et al.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  D. Berry,et al.  Some components and consequences of a babyface. , 1985 .

[27]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.