A statistical method for quantifying songbird phonology and syntax

Songbirds are the preeminent animal model for understanding how the brain encodes and produces learned vocalizations. Here, we report a new statistical method, the Kullback-Leibler (K-L) distance, for analyzing vocal change over time. First, we use a computerized recording system to capture all song syllables produced by birds each day. Sound Analysis Pro software [Tchernichovski O, Nottebohm F, Ho CE, Pesaran B, Mitra PP. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim Behav 2000;59:1167-76] is then used to measure the duration of each syllable as well as four spectral features: pitch, entropy, frequency modulation, and pitch goodness. Next, two-dimensional scatter plots of each day of singing are created where syllable duration is on the x-axis and each of the spectral features is represented separately on the y-axis. Each point in the scatter plots represents one syllable and we regard these plots as random samples from a probability distribution. We then apply the standard information-theoretic quantity K-L distance to measure dissimilarity in phonology across days of singing. A variant of this procedure can also be used to analyze differences in syllable syntax.

[1]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  A learning program that ensures prompt and versatile vocal imitation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. E. Ho,et al.  A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  M. Konishi,et al.  Long Memory in Song Learning by Zebra Finches , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[5]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  Juvenile zebra finches can use multiple strategies to learn the same song , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  N. Hessler,et al.  Role of the midbrain dopaminergic system in modulation of vocal brain activation by social context , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  C. Pytte,et al.  Increasing stereotypy in adult zebra finch song correlates with a declining rate of adult neurogenesis , 2007, Developmental neurobiology.

[8]  Naoya Aoki,et al.  Developmental modulation of the temporal relationship between brain and behavior. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  David S Vicario,et al.  Early auditory experience generates long-lasting memories that may subserve vocal learning in songbirds. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  E. Nordeen,et al.  Dissociation between extension of the sensitive period for avian vocal learning and dendritic spine loss in the song nucleus lMAN , 2005, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[11]  M. Coleman,et al.  Recovery of impaired songs following unilateral but not bilateral lesions of nucleus uvaeformis of adult zebra finches. , 2005, Journal of neurobiology.

[12]  S. White,et al.  FoxP2 Regulation during Undirected Singing in Adult Songbirds , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Frank Johnson,et al.  HVC microlesions do not destabilize the vocal patterns of adult male zebra finches with prior ablation of LMAN , 2007, Developmental neurobiology.

[14]  Richard Mooney,et al.  Acute injections of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in a vocal premotor nucleus reversibly disrupt adult birdsong stability and trigger syllable deletion. , 2005, Journal of neurobiology.

[15]  R. Bertram,et al.  Auditory-Dependent Vocal Recovery in Adult Male Zebra Finches Is Facilitated by Lesion of a Forebrain Pathway That Includes the Basal Ganglia , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Gerald E. Hough,et al.  Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Vocal Distortion on Song Maintenance in Zebra Finches , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Richard Mooney,et al.  Auditory Plasticity in a Basal Ganglia–Forebrain Pathway during Decrystallization of Adult Birdsong , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Zann,et al.  Developmental stress impairs song complexity but not learning accuracy in non-domesticated zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  Sarah M. N. Woolley,et al.  Vocal Memory and Learning in Adult Bengalese Finches with Regenerated Hair Cells , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  Variable rate of singing and variable song duration are associated with high immediate early gene expression in two anterior forebrain song nuclei. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Limits on Reacquisition of Song in Adult Zebra Finches Exposed to White Noise , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  P. Mitra,et al.  How sleep affects the developmental learning of bird song , 2005, Nature.

[23]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  Experience Affects Recruitment of New Neurons But Not Adult Neuron Number , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Robin C. Ashmore,et al.  Hemispheric coordination is necessary for song production in adult birds: implications for a dual role for forebrain nuclei in vocal motor control. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Huaiyu Zhu.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1997 .

[26]  J. Sakata,et al.  Real-Time Contributions of Auditory Feedback to Avian Vocal Motor Control , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Scharff,et al.  Incomplete and Inaccurate Vocal Imitation after Knockdown of FoxP2 in Songbird Basal Ganglia Nucleus Area X , 2007, PLoS biology.

[28]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  High Levels of New Neuron Addition Persist When the Sensitive Period for Song Learning Is Experimentally Prolonged , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Bilateral LMAN lesions cancel differences in HVC neuronal recruitment induced by unilateral syringeal denervation , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Sensorimotor nucleus NIf is necessary for auditory processing but not vocal motor output in the avian song system. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Aaron S. Andalman,et al.  Vocal Experimentation in the Juvenile Songbird Requires a Basal Ganglia Circuit , 2005, PLoS biology.