Continuous data assimilation for downscaling large-footprint soil moisture retrievals

Soil moisture is a key component of the hydrologic cycle, influencing processes leading to runoff generation, infiltration and groundwater recharge, evaporation and transpiration. Generally, the measurement scale for soil moisture is found to be different from the modeling scales for these processes. Reducing this mismatch between observation and model scales in necessary for improved hydrological modeling. An innovative approach to downscaling coarse resolution soil moisture data by combining continuous data assimilation and physically based modeling is presented. In this approach, we exploit the features of Continuous Data Assimilation (CDA) which was initially designed for general dissipative dynamical systems and later tested numerically on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation, and the Benard equation. A nudging term, estimated as the misfit between interpolants of the assimilated coarse grid measurements and the fine grid model solution, is added to the model equations to constrain the model’s large scale variability by available measurements. Soil moisture fields generated at a fine resolution by a physically-based vadose zone model (HYDRUS) are subjected to data assimilation conditioned upon coarse resolution observations. This enables nudging of the model outputs towards values that honor the coarse resolution dynamics while still being generated at the fine scale. Results show that the approach is feasible to generate fine scale soil moisture fields across large extents, based on coarse scale observations. Application of this approach is likely in generating fine and intermediate resolution soil moisture fields conditioned on the radiometerbased, coarse resolution products from remote sensing satellites.

[1]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data , 2014 .

[2]  Edriss S. Titi,et al.  Continuous Data Assimilation Using General Interpolant Observables , 2013, J. Nonlinear Sci..

[3]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Calibration of a land surface model using multiple data sets , 2005 .

[4]  Hakima Bessaih,et al.  Continuous data assimilation with stochastically noisy data , 2014, 1406.1533.

[5]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Demonstration of a geostatistical approach to physically consistent downscaling of climate modeling simulations , 2013 .

[6]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Assessing the impact of model spin‐up on surface water‐groundwater interactions using an integrated hydrologic model , 2012 .

[7]  Edriss S. Titi,et al.  A Computational Study of a Data Assimilation Algorithm for the Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes Equations , 2015, 1505.01234.

[8]  Raghavendra B. Jana,et al.  A comparative study of multiple approaches to soil hydraulic parameter scaling applied at the hillslope scale , 2012 .

[9]  T. Harter,et al.  Upscaling Hydraulic Properties and Soil Water Flow Processes in Heterogeneous Soils: A Review , 2007 .

[10]  G. Evensen.  Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[11]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Copula-Derived Observation Operators for Assimilating TMI and AMSR-E Retrieved Soil Moisture into Land Surface Models , 2007 .

[12]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Examining the relationship between intermediate-scale soil moisture andterrestrial evaporation within a semi-arid grassland , 2016 .

[13]  Raghavendra B. Jana,et al.  Multiscale Pedotransfer Functions for Soil Water Retention , 2007 .

[14]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Evaluation of AMSR-E-Derived Soil Moisture Retrievals Using Ground-Based and PSR Airborne Data during SMEX02 , 2005 .

[15]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Modeling and assimilation of root zone soil moisture using remote sensing observations in Walnut Gulch Watershed during SMEX04 , 2008 .

[16]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Downscaling of radio brightness measurements for soil moisture estimation: A four‐dimensional variational data assimilation approach , 2001 .

[17]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Initial soil moisture retrievals from AMSR‐E: Multiscale comparison using in situ data and rainfall patterns over Iowa , 2005 .

[18]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Integration of soil moisture remote sensing and hydrologic modeling using data assimilation , 1998 .

[19]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Scaling characteristics of spatial patterns of soil moisture from distributed modelling , 2007 .

[20]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  A space and time scale‐dependent nonlinear geostatistical approach for downscaling daily precipitation and temperature , 2015 .

[21]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Estimation of regional terrestrial water cycle using multi-sensor remote sensing observations and data assimilation , 2008 .

[22]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Model parameter analysis using remotely sensed pattern information in a multi-constraint framework , 2011 .

[23]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter for soil moisture data assimilation , 2007 .

[24]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data , 2015 .

[25]  Edriss S. Titi,et al.  Abridged Continuous Data Assimilation for the 2D Navier–Stokes Equations Utilizing Measurements of Only One Component of the Velocity Field , 2015, 1504.05978.

[26]  Raghavendra B. Jana,et al.  A topography‐based scaling algorithm for soil hydraulic parameters at hillslope scales: Field testing , 2012 .

[27]  P. L. Houtekamer,et al.  Ensemble Kalman filtering , 2005 .

[28]  Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen,et al.  A New Methodology for Assimilation of Initial Soil Moisture Fields in Weather Prediction Models Using Meteosat and NOAA Data. , 1997 .

[29]  Ibrahim Hoteit,et al.  A Comparison of Ensemble Kalman Filters for Storm Surge Assimilation , 2014 .

[30]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation , 2004, Science.