Comparison of Strategies for Signaling of Scheduling Assignments in Wireless OFDMA

This paper considers the transmission of scheduling information in orthogonal frequency-division multiple-access (OFDMA)-based cellular communication systems such as the Third-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) long-term evolution (LTE). These systems provide efficient usage of radio resources by allowing users to be dynamically scheduled in both frequency and time. This requires considerable amounts of scheduling information to be sent to the users. This paper compares two basic transmission strategies: transmitting a separate scheduling message to each user versus broadcasting a joint scheduling message to all users. Different scheduling granularities are considered, as are different scheduling algorithms. The schemes are evaluated in the context of the LTE downlink using multiuser system simulations, assuming a full-buffer situation. The results show that separate transmission of the scheduling information requires a slightly lower overhead than joint broadcasting when proportional fair scheduling is employed and the users are spread out over the cell area. The results also indicate that the scheduling granularity standardized for LTE provides a good tradeoff between scheduling granularity and overhead.

[1]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  Performance analysis of dynamic OFDMA systems with inband signaling , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Angela Doufexi,et al.  Joint Time-Frequency Domain Proportional Fair Scheduler with HARQ for 3GPP LTE Systems , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[3]  Taesoo Kwon,et al.  Adaptive-Modulation-and-Coding-Based Transmission of Control Messages for Resource Allocation in Mobile Communication Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Resource Allocation and Control Signaling in the WINNER Flexible MAC Concept , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[5]  Erik Dahlman,et al.  3G Evolution: HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband , 2007 .

[6]  J. M. Holtzman CDMA forward link waterfilling power control , 2000, VTC2000-Spring. 2000 IEEE 51st Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37026).

[7]  Khaled Ben Letaief,et al.  Multiuser OFDM with adaptive subcarrier, bit, and power allocation , 1999, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[8]  Yong-Hwan Lee,et al.  Efficient Transmission of Multicast MAPs in IEEE 802.16e , 2008, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[9]  Rüdiger L. Urbanke,et al.  Design of capacity-approaching irregular low-density parity-check codes , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  On Coding of Scheduling Information in OFDM , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[11]  G. Blelloch Introduction to Data Compression * , 2022 .

[12]  David Tse,et al.  Fundamentals of Wireless Communication , 2005 .

[13]  Erik G. Larsson Optimal OFDMA Downlink Scheduling Under a Control Signaling Cost Constraint , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Xiaoxin Qiu,et al.  On the performance of adaptive modulation in cellular systems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[15]  Jae-Woo So Performance Analysis of VoIP Services in the IEEE 802.16e OFDMA System With Inband Signaling , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Alain Glavieux,et al.  Reflections on the Prize Paper : "Near optimum error-correcting coding and decoding: turbo codes" , 1998 .

[17]  J. Brouet,et al.  Compression of associated signaling for adaptive multi-carrier systems , 2004, 2004 IEEE 59th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2004-Spring (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37514).

[18]  Wei Yu,et al.  Constant-power waterfilling: performance bound and low-complexity implementation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[19]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  QoS aware adaptive resource allocation techniques for fair scheduling in OFDMA based broadband wireless access systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[20]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .