High level bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones.

INTRODUCTION While contamination of mobile phones in the hospital has been found to be common in several studies, little information about bacterial abundance on phones used in the community is available. Our aim was to quantitatively determine the bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones. METHODS Altogether 27 mobile phones were studied. The contact plate method and microbial identification using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer were used for culture studies. Quantitative PCR reaction for detection of universal 16S rRNA, Enterococcus faecalis 16S rRNA and Escherichia coli allantoin permease were performed, and the presence of tetracycline (tetA, tetB, tetM), erythromycin (ermB) and sulphonamide (sul1) resistance genes was assessed. RESULTS We found a high median bacterial count on secondary school students' mobile phones (10.5 CFU/cm2) and a median of 17,032 bacterial 16S rRNA gene copies per phone. Potentially pathogenic microbes (Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus cereus and Neisseria flavescens) were found among dominant microbes more often on phones with higher percentage of E. faecalis in total bacterial 16S rRNA. No differences in contamination level or dominating bacterial species between phone owner's gender and between phone types (touch screen/keypad) were found. No antibiotic resistance genes were detected on mobile phone surfaces. CONCLUSION Quantitative study methods revealed high level bacterial contamination of secondary school students' mobile phones.

[1]  James F. Meadow,et al.  Mobile phones carry the personal microbiome of their owners , 2014, PeerJ.

[2]  Zhu Wang,et al.  High Levels of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Their Correlations with Bacterial Community and Mobile Genetic Elements in Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment Bioreactors , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  H. Heuer,et al.  Manure and sulfadiazine synergistically increased bacterial antibiotic resistance in soil over at least two months. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[4]  R. Prill,et al.  Filthy lucre: A metagenomic pilot study of microbes found on circulating currency in New York City , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  A. Pruden,et al.  Effect of various sludge digestion conditions on sulfonamide, macrolide, and tetracycline resistance genes and class I integrons. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a German university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products , 2015, Folia Microbiologica.

[7]  M. Mcmurdo,et al.  Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Feces from Healthy Elderly Volunteers and Hospitalized Elderly Patients by Using Real-Time PCR and Effects of Antibiotic Treatment on the Fecal Microbiota , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  Jean M. Macklaim,et al.  Microbiome Profiling by Illumina Sequencing of Combinatorial Sequence-Tagged PCR Products , 2010, PLoS ONE.

[9]  C. Ustun,et al.  Health Care Workers’ Mobile Phones: A Potential Cause of Microbial Cross-Contamination Between Hospitals and Community , 2012, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[10]  K. Schiff,et al.  Epidemiologic evaluation of multiple alternate microbial water quality monitoring indicators at three California beaches. , 2016, Water research.

[11]  C. Knapp,et al.  Differential fate of erythromycin and beta-lactam resistance genes from swine lagoon waste under different aquatic conditions. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[12]  C. Knapp,et al.  Abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater lagoons at cattle feedlots with different antibiotic use strategies. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[13]  Mar Alvarez,et al.  Chlorhexidine avoids skin bacteria recolonization more than triclosan. , 2016, American journal of infection control.

[14]  P. Wolf,et al.  The Skin Microbiome: Is It Affected by UV-induced Immune Suppression? , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[15]  Ahmet Dilek,et al.  Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens? , 2009 .

[16]  Ahmed A Abdulhaq,et al.  Prevalence of antibacterial resistant bacterial contaminants from mobile phones of hospital inpatients , 2014, The Libyan journal of medicine.

[17]  James O Leckie,et al.  Enterococcus spp on fomites and hands indicate increased risk of respiratory illness in child care centers. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[18]  S. Biranjia-Hurdoyal,et al.  The Importance of Mobile Phones in the Possible Transmission of Bacterial Infections in the Community , 2014, Journal of Community Health.

[19]  A. Fodor,et al.  Comparison of culture and molecular techniques for microbial community characterization in infected necrotizing pancreatitis. , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[20]  F. Cellini,et al.  SYBR green real time‐polymerase chain reaction as a rapid and alternative assay for the efficient identification of all existing Escherichia coli biotypes approved directly in wastewater samples , 2012, Biotechnology progress.

[21]  A. Matussek,et al.  Quantification of genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides, 𝛃-lactams and tetracyclines in wastewater environments by real-time PCR , 2009, International journal of environmental health research.

[22]  J. Yim,et al.  Contamination rates between smart cell phones and non-smart cell phones of healthcare workers. , 2013, Journal of hospital medicine.