Differences in Strategies and Performance of Different Types of Innovators

The strategies and competencies of small and medium-sized firms are explored here using the responses to the Survey of Growing Small and Medium Size Enterprises, conducted by Statistics Canada. The paper classifies small and medium-sized firms by innovator type and explores the complementary strategies in management, marketing, human resources and financing that are adopted by each innovator type and the success of each type of innovator. A taxonomy of innovative types is developed that is based on the product/process development orientation of the firm. Differences in competencies in the area of human resources, management, marketing and finance that are possessed by firms in each group are examined. Firms are classified into one of four groups-product innovators, comprehensive (product and process) innovators, process innovators, or non-innovators-based on their responses to 22 innovation-related questions on the survey. These groups correspond to different stages in the development of a product market. Product innovators occupy the first stage, the time when the product is initially introduced. Comprehensive innovators represent the second stage, when the product demand is still growing, and firms in addition to producing new products, have begun to make dramatic improvements in their production efficiencies, by concentrating on process innovations as well as product innovations. Process innovators represent the third phase in the development of a product market, when the product characteristics have become established, and firms seek to improve their market share mainly by improving their production efficiencies. Finally, the last phase is characterized by a relatively stable product line, with a mature production technology. The competencies of firms differ across these innovative types. Comprehensive innovators tend to develop greater capabilities than the other innovators in a wide range of areas. Comprehensive innovators also tend to outperform the other innovators in terms of growth in sales, market share, and employment size. Innovators also tailor their financial strategies to their innovator type. Product innovators focus on a low debt/asset strategy with non-standard sources like venture capital. In later stages of the innovation life cycle-comprehensive and process innovators place great emphasis on higher debt/asset ratios and make greater use of long-term debt and equity capital.

[1]  Joanne Johnson,et al.  Business Strategies in Innovative and Non-Innovative Firms in Canada , 1995 .

[2]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[3]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  The Dynamics of Industrial Competition , 1995 .

[4]  B. Dalum National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[5]  W. Abernathy,et al.  The climate for innovation in industry: The role of management attitudes and practices in consumer electronics , 1982 .

[6]  G. Pisano,et al.  Beyond World-Class : The New Manufacturing Strategy , 1994 .

[7]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[8]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[9]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Technology and industrial innovation in Sweden: A study of technology-based firms formed between 1965 and 1980 , 1993 .

[10]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[11]  R. Chaganti The Entrepreneurial Institute: Education and Training for Minority Small Business Owners , 1987 .

[12]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[13]  Alex Miller A taxonomy of technological settings, with related strategies and performance levels , 1988 .

[14]  H. Wichmann,et al.  Exports: A Necessary Ingredient in the Growth of Small Business Firms , 1986 .

[15]  R. Harrod Economic Change , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .