Managing expectations, rights, and duties in large-scale genomics initiatives: a European comparison

[1]  D. McCormick,et al.  Research participants: critical friends, agents for change , 2022, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[2]  Richard Milne,et al.  Towards equitable and trustworthy genomics research , 2022, EBioMedicine.

[3]  Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor,et al.  Harmonization after the GDPR? Divergences in the rules for genetic and health data sharing in four member states and ways to overcome them by EU measures: insights from Germany, Greece, Latvia and Sweden , 2021, Seminars in Cancer Biology.

[4]  E. Winkler,et al.  Data protection-compliant broad consent for secondary use of health care data and human biosamples for (bio)medical research: Towards a new German national standard , 2021, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  J. Eufinger,et al.  Genomdaten FAIR und sicher teilen: Das Deutsche Humangenom-Phänom Archiv (GHGA) als Baustein der Nationalen Forschungsdateninfrastruktur , 2021 .

[6]  Richard Milne,et al.  Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries , 2021, Genome medicine.

[7]  B. Fallery.  La plateforme de données de santé Health data hub , 2021, Revue Française de Gestion.

[8]  J. Kaye,et al.  ‘CTRL’: an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research , 2021, European journal of human genetics : EJHG.

[9]  M. Parker,et al.  The ethics of genomic medicine: redefining values and norms in the UK and France , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[10]  J. Kaye,et al.  Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[11]  Ruth Horn,et al.  Sharing whilst caring: solidarity and public trust in a data-driven healthcare system , 2020, BMC medical ethics.

[12]  Rachel H Horton,et al.  Exploring broad consent in the context of the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods study , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[13]  D. Adam.  The promise and peril of the new science of social genomics , 2019, Nature.

[14]  Marc Cuggia,et al.  The French Health Data Hub and the German Medical Informatics Initiatives: Two National Projects to Promote Data Sharing in Healthcare , 2019, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[15]  Sandi Dheensa,et al.  Fostering trust in healthcare: Participants' experiences, views, and concerns about the 100,000 genomes project. , 2019, European journal of medical genetics.

[16]  P. Mills,et al.  Why we need a new social contract for data in healthcare , 2019 .

[17]  S. Semler,et al.  German Medical Informatics Initiative , 2018, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[18]  N. Hallowell.  Research or clinical care: what’s the difference? , 2018, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[19]  Bobbie Farsides,et al.  Towards a national genomics medicine service: the challenges facing clinical-research hybrid practices and the case of the 100 000 genomes project , 2018, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[20]  M. Parker,et al.  Chapter 16. Ethics and the social contract for genomics in the NHS , 2017 .

[21]  Denis Regaud.  Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés , 2016 .

[22]  L. Nimita,et al.  The Modern Social Contract between the Patient, the Healthcare Provider,and Digital Medicine , 2014 .

[23]  D. Black.  Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics , 2002 .

[24]  Gerald F. Gaus,et al.  Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract , 1996 .

[25]  L. Frank.  What Is Social Order? , 1944, American Journal of Sociology.