Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan

The diffusion of digital media does not always have democratic consequences. This mixed-methods study examines how the government of Azerbaijan dissuaded Internet users from political activism. We examine how digital media were used for networked authoritarianism, a form of Internet control common in former Soviet states where manipulation over digitally mediated social networks is used more than outright censorship. Through a content analysis of 3 years of Azerbaijani media, a 2-year structural equation model of the relationship between Internet use and attitudes toward protest, and interviews with Azerbaijani online activists, we find that the government has successfully dissuaded frequent Internet users from supporting protest and average Internet users from using social media for political purposes.

[1]  P. Howard.  The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam , 2010 .

[2]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[3]  Sheetal D. Agarwal,et al.  When Do States Disconnect Their Digital Networks? Regime Responses to the Political Uses of Social Media , 2011 .

[4]  Andrew F. March.  State ideology and the legitimation of authoritarianism: The case of post-Soviet Uzbekistan 1 , 2003 .

[5]  Sarah Kendzior.  Digital distrust: Uzbek cynicism and solidarity in the Internet Age , 2011 .

[6]  Ronald J. Deibert,et al.  Liberation vs. Control: The Future of Cyberspace , 2010 .

[7]  R. Rice,et al.  Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts , 2003 .

[8]  Aytan Gahramanova.  Internal and external factors in the democratization of Azerbaijan , 2009 .

[9]  R. L. Hall,et al.  How Education Affects Attitude to Protest: A Further Test , 1991 .

[10]  Alec Rasizade.  Azerbaijan in transition to the “New Age of Democracy”☆ , 2003 .

[11]  Katy E. Pearce.  Poverty in the South Caucasus , 2011 .

[12]  P. Howard.  Reply to Evgeny Morozov's review of The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[13]  H. Pleines,et al.  Challenges of the Caspian Resource Boom: Domestic Elites and Policy-making , 2012 .

[14]  R. Hughes.  Considering the Vignette Technique and its Application to a Study of Drug Injecting and HIV Risk and Safer Behaviour , 1998 .

[15]  R. L. Hall.  Effects of Education on Attitude to Protest. , 1986 .

[16]  C. Murray,et al.  Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Jonathan N. Wand,et al.  Comparing Incomparable Survey Responses: Evaluating and Selecting Anchoring Vignettes , 2008, Political Analysis.

[18]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[19]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[20]  Rebecca MacKinnon,et al.  Liberation Technology: China's "Networked Authoritarianism" , 2011 .

[21]  Dennis M. Murphy.  The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom , 2012 .

[22]  Baogang He,et al.  Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development , 2011, Perspectives on Politics.

[23]  Shanthi Kalathil,et al.  Open Networks, Closed Regimes , 2002 .

[24]  An Assessment of Social Capital in Georgia , 2011 .

[25]  G. Guliyeva.  Democratization and the Rule of Law in Azerbaijan: Europe’s Relevance , 2005 .

[26]  Farid Guliyev,et al.  The Trans-Caspian Energy Route: Cronyism, Competition and Cooperation in Kazakh Oil Export , 2009 .

[27]  H. Hale.  Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia , 2005 .

[28]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[29]  M. Skoric.  The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: information technology and political Islam , 2011 .

[30]  Christopher P. M. Waters.  The state of law in the South Caucasus , 2005 .