In many countries hydropower constitutes a large share of the electricity producing capacity. In the earlier regulated electricity markets, production capacities exceeded demand due to security of supply concerns. The present deregulated markets base investments upon profitability alone, and security of supply issues are claimed to be less important. Market operators trust the pricing mechanism in competitive markets to clear. Then low inflow constitutes a less problem. Several markets, both under regulated and deregulated regimes, have faced serious droughts. Some of them have experienced problems with market clearance (Chile, Brazil, California) while other markets functioned well (The Nordic market). Important features to the market response are the flexibility of demand, the pattern of inflow shortage, the storage capacities, the possibility of trade between regions with different production technologies, and the market design and concentration. We apply an empirical based market model to simulate the effects under two inflow shortage scenarios in an international market with combined hydro and thermal capacities and restricted transmission capacities. We compare the scenarios with actual events and show that the model and the real market outcome are comparable. The simulations do not reveal any problems with the functioning of the market, which should calm down the anxiousness about security of supply in deregulated markets with stochastic energy supply.
[1]
Einar Hope,et al.
Deregulation of electricity markets: The Norwegian experience
,
2005
.
[2]
Judith Gurney.
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
,
1985
.
[3]
S. Borenstein,et al.
Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market
,
2002
.
[4]
R. Weiner,et al.
Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation
,
1985
.
[5]
James Bushnell,et al.
Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures
,
1999
.
[6]
Michael J. Orlando,et al.
Neither Lucky Nor Good: The Case of Electricity Deregulation in California
,
2005
.
[7]
C. Carrington,et al.
Linking consumer energy efficiency with security of supply
,
2007
.
[8]
Deregulation of Electricity Markets
,
2005
.
[9]
Steven Stoft,et al.
Market power in California electricity markets
,
1995
.
[10]
Finn Roar Aune,et al.
Gas power generation in Norway: Good or bad for the climate? Revised version
,
2000
.
[11]
M. Pollitt.
Electricity Reform in Chile. Lessons for Developing Countries
,
2004
.
[12]
S. Borenstein,et al.
The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry
,
1997
.
[13]
Frank A. Wolak,et al.
Diagnosing the California Electricity Crisis
,
2003
.
[14]
Michel Moreaux,et al.
Water resource and power generation
,
2001
.