Non-Integer Expansion Embedding for Prediction-Based Reversible Watermarking

This paper aims at reducing the embedding distortion by improving predictor's performance for prediction-error expansion (PE) based reversible watermarking. In the existing PE embedding methods, the predicted values or their variety should be rounded to integer values. This will restrict predictor's performance since the prediction context is only with past pixels (image) or samples (audio). In this paper, we propose a non-integer PE (NIPE) embedding approach, which can proceed non-integer prediction errors for data embedding by only expanding integer element of a prediction error while keeping its fractional element unchanged. More importantly, the NIPE scheme allows the predictor to estimate the current pixel/sample not restricted only past pixels/samples. We also propose a novel noncausal prediction strategy by combining past and future pixels/samples as the context. Experimental results for some standard test clips show that the non-integer output of predictor provides higher prediction performance, and the proposed NIPE scheme with the new predicting strategy can reduce the embedding distortion for the same payload.

[1]  Rangding Wang,et al.  Reversible Data Hiding for Audio Based on Prediction Error Expansion , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing.

[2]  Brett A. Bradley,et al.  High-capacity invertible data-hiding algorithm for digital audio , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Adnan M. Alattar,et al.  > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < Reversible Watermark Using the Difference Expansion of A Generalized Integer Transform , 2022 .

[4]  Yun Q. Shi,et al.  Reversible Data Hiding , 2003, IWDW.

[5]  Jun Tian,et al.  Reversible data embedding using a difference expansion , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[6]  Jeffrey J. Rodríguez,et al.  Expansion Embedding Techniques for Reversible Watermarking , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Dinu Coltuc,et al.  Improved Embedding for Prediction-Based Reversible Watermarking , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[8]  Henk J. A. M. Heijmans,et al.  Reversible data embedding into images using wavelet techniques and sorting , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Jeho Nam,et al.  Reversible Watermarking Algorithm Using Sorting and Prediction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[10]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Lossless generalized-LSB data embedding , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Stephan Katzenbeisser,et al.  Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermaking , 1999 .

[12]  Arno J. van Leest,et al.  High capacity reversible watermarking for audio , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[13]  F. Willems,et al.  Capacity bounds and constructions for reversible data-hiding , 2002, 2002 14th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing Proceedings. DSP 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8628).

[14]  Christophe De Vleeschouwer,et al.  Circular interpretation of bijective transformations in lossless watermarking for media asset management , 2003, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[15]  Jessica J. Fridrich,et al.  Lossless data embedding for all image formats , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  The LOCO-I lossless image compression algorithm: principles and standardization into JPEG-LS , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..