Heat-Transfer Characteristics of Liquid Sodium in a Solar Receiver Tube with a Nonuniform Heat Flux

This paper presents a numerical simulation on the heat transfer of liquid sodium in a solar receiver tube, as the liquid sodium is a promising heat-transfer candidate for the next generation solar-power-tower (SPT) system. A comparison between three mediums—solar salt, Hitec and liquid sodium—is presented under uniform and nonuniform heat-flux configurations. We studied the effects of mass flow rate (Qm), inlet temperature (Tin), and maximum heat flux (qomax), on the average heat-transfer coefficient (h) and the friction coefficient (f) of the three mediums. The results show that the h of liquid sodium is about 2.5 to 5 times than other two molten salts when Tin is varying from 550 to 800 K, Qm is 1.0 kg/s, and qomax is 0.1 MW/m2. For maximum heat fluxes from 0.1 to 0.3 MW/m2, the h of liquid sodium is always an order of magnitude larger than that of Hitec and Solar-Salt (S-S), while maintaining a small friction coefficient.

[1]  W. Tao,et al.  The impact of concrete structure on the thermal performance of the dual-media thermocline thermal storage tank using concrete as the solid medium , 2014 .

[2]  Walter B. Bienert.  The heat pipe and its application to solar receivers , 1980 .

[3]  E. Sparrow,et al.  Handbook of Numerical Heat Transfer , 1988 .

[4]  Robert Stieglitz,et al.  Application of liquid metals for solar energy systems , 2012 .

[5]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  Liquid sodium versus Hitec as a heat transfer fluid in solar thermal central receiver systems , 2012 .

[6]  Alexis B. Zavoico,et al.  Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0 , 2001 .

[7]  K. Matsubara,et al.  Spanwise Heat Transport in Turbulent Channel Flow With Prandtl Numbers Ranging From 0.025 to 5.0 , 2012 .

[8]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Assessment of Solar Power Tower Driven Ultrasupercritical Steam Cycles Applying Tubular Central Receivers With Varied Heat Transfer Media , 2010 .

[9]  Cole Boulevard,et al.  Executive Summary: Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts , 2003 .

[10]  A. Fritsch,et al.  Liquid Metals as Efficient Coolants for High-intensity Point-focus Receivers: Implications to the Design and Performance of Next-generation CSP Systems , 2014 .

[11]  C. Marugán-Cruz,et al.  Thermal Stresses Analysis of a Circular Tube in a Central Receiver , 2014 .

[12]  María de los Reyes Rodríguez Sánchez,et al.  Thermal, mechanical and hydrodynamic analysis to optimize the design of molten salt central receivers of solar tower power plants , 2013 .

[13]  V. Gnielinski.  New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow , 1976 .

[14]  Xin Li,et al.  Allowable flux density on a solar central receiver , 2014 .

[15]  E. Baake,et al.  Liquid metals for solar power systems , 2017 .

[16]  Walter Chapman,et al.  Thermal stresses in radiant tubes due to axial, circumferential and radial temperature distributions , 2009 .

[17]  Greg R. Schmidt,et al.  Design of a high temperature (1350 °C) solar receiver based on a liquid metal heat transfer fluid: Sensitivity analysis , 2018 .

[18]  Von Backstrm Tw,et al.  NaK as a primary heat transfer fluid in thermal solar power installations , 2012 .

[19]  Ibrahim Hassan,et al.  Film Cooling Injection Hole Geometry: Hole Shape Comparison for Compound Cooling Orientation , 2001 .

[20]  J. Pacio,et al.  Assessment of liquid metal technology status and research paths for their use as efficient heat transfer fluids in solar central receiver systems , 2013 .

[21]  Marcelino Sánchez,et al.  Towards Cost-competitive Solar Towers – Energy Cost Reductions based on Decoupled Solar Combined Cycles (DSCC) , 2014 .

[22]  Ralf Uhlig,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation of liquid metals as heat transfer fluids in concentrated solar power plants Original Research Article , 2013 .

[23]  Ya-Ling He,et al.  Convective Heat Transfer Enhancement: Mechanisms, Techniques, and Performance Evaluation , 2014 .

[24]  A. Fritsch,et al.  A comparison between transient CFD and FEM simulations of solar central receiver tubes using molten salt and liquid metals , 2017 .

[25]  D. Kearney,et al.  Assessment of a Molten Salt Heat Transfer Fluid in a Parabolic Trough Solar Field , 2003 .

[26]  Xin Li,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study of the Heat Transfer Characteristics in Solar Thermal Absorber Tubes with Circumferentially Non-uniform Heat Flux , 2014 .

[27]  N. Siegel,et al.  Thermophysical Property Measurement of Nitrate Salt Heat Transfer Fluids , 2011 .

[28]  M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez,et al.  Thermal design guidelines of solar power towers , 2014 .

[29]  R. Stieglitz,et al.  Liquid metal technology for concentrated solar power systems: Contributions by the German research program , 2014 .

[30]  Baldev Raj,et al.  Lessons Learned from Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Operation and Their Ramifications for Future Reactors with Respect to Enhanced Safety and Reliability , 2008 .

[31]  M. Romero,et al.  Next generation of liquid metal and other high-performance receiver designs for concentrating solar thermal (CST) central tower systems , 2017 .

[32]  R. Monterreal,et al.  Heat flux and temperature prediction on a volumetric receiver installed in a solar furnace , 2014 .

[33]  L. L. vant-Hull,et al.  The Role of “Allowable Flux Density” in the Design and Operation of Molten-Salt Solar Central Receivers , 2001 .

[34]  Konstantin Mikityuk,et al.  Heat transfer to liquid metal: Review of data and correlations for tube bundles , 2009 .

[35]  Chia-Jung Hsu.  Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 1981 .

[36]  W. Chueh,et al.  Pumping liquid metal at high temperatures up to 1,673 kelvin , 2017, Nature.