The CALUX bioassay: Current status of its application to screening food and feed

The CALUX bioassay is at present the best screening method for dioxins and dioxin-like (dl) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in food and feed, and the only assay used in routine monitoring and during larger incidents. Furthermore, the use of bioassays in addition to chemical reference methods allows the discovery of novel contaminants with potentially adverse effects on human health. The CALUX bioassay shows a clear dose-related response both with dioxin standards and contaminated samples, but requires a clear strategy with respect to decision limits, necessary to deal with the many different action and tolerance limits in European Union (EU) legislation. In future, the CALUX bioassay will profit from further optimization, especially with respect to the clean-up procedure. As demonstrated in the limited number of interlaboratory studies performed so far, this should lead to an even more robust assay that can be easily introduced into less experienced laboratories. The present article discusses the different issues, based on some practical examples from the EU-DIFFERENCE project and gives recommendations for future studies.

[1]  W. Traag,et al.  The German bakery waste incident; use of a combined approach of screening and confirmation for dioxins in feed and food. , 2004, Talanta.

[2]  N Debacker,et al.  Validation of the CALUX bioassay for PCDD/F analyses in human blood plasma and comparison with GC-HRMS. , 2004, Talanta.

[3]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Validation and use of the CALUX-bioassay for the determination of dioxins and PCBs in bovine milk. , 1998, Food additives and contaminants.

[4]  L. Goeyens,et al.  Interpretation of CALUX results in view of the EU maximal TEQ level in milk. , 2004, Talanta.

[5]  Gauthier Eppe,et al.  Validation and interpretation of CALUX as a tool for the estimation of dioxin-like activity in marine biological matrixes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  P. Leonards,et al.  The calux (chemical‐activated luciferase expression) assay adapted and validated for measuring TCDD equivalents in blood plasma , 1997 .

[7]  M. Denison,et al.  Application of the luciferase recombinant cell culture bioassay system for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  L. Birnbaum,et al.  Chemically activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX) cell bioassay analysis for the estimation of dioxin-like activity: critical parameters of the CALUX procedure that impact assay results. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Joris Van Loco,et al.  Importance of REP values when comparing the CALUX bioassay results with chemoanalyses results Example with spiked vegetable oils. , 2004, Talanta.

[10]  V. Nelen,et al.  Persistent organochlorine pollutants in human serum of 50-65 years old women in the Flanders Environmental and Health Study (FLEHS). Part 2: Correlations among PCBs, PCDD/PCDFs and the use of predictive markers. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[11]  A M Vinggaard,et al.  Applicability of the CALUX bioassay for screening of dioxin levels in human milk samples , 2003, Food additives and contaminants.

[12]  Greet Schoeters,et al.  The evaluation of dioxin and dioxin-like contaminants in selected food samples obtained from the Belgian market: comparison of TEQ measurements obtained through the CALUX bioassay with congener specific chemical analyses. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[13]  E. Abad,et al.  An episode of dioxin contamination in feedingstuff: the choline chloride case. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[14]  R. Malisch,et al.  Increase of the PCDD/F-contamination of milk, butter and meat samples by use of contaminated citrus pulp. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[15]  L. Goeyens,et al.  The international validation of bio- and chemical-analytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs: the DIFFERENCE project rounds 1 and 2. , 2004, Talanta.

[16]  Shin-ichi Sakai,et al.  Brominated dioxin-like compounds: in vitro assessment in comparison to classical dioxin-like compounds and other polyaromatic compounds. , 2003, Environment international.

[17]  G. Clark,et al.  Analysis of Ah receptor pathway activation by brominated flame retardants. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[18]  K. Davison,et al.  Chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran concentrations in beef animals from a feeding study. , 2000, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[19]  E. De Pauw,et al.  DR-CALUX((R)) screening of food samples: evaluation of the quantitative approach to measure dioxin, furans and dioxin-like PCBs. , 2004, Talanta.

[20]  A. Brouwer,et al.  Activation of the Ah receptor by extracts of dietary herbal supplements, vegetables, and fruits. , 2003, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[21]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Elucidation of sources, pathways and fate of dioxins, furans and PCBs requires performant analysis techniques. , 2004, Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry.

[22]  G. Clark,et al.  Recombinant cell bioassay systems for the detection and relative quantitation of halogenated dioxins and related chemicals. , 2004, Talanta.

[23]  A. Bernard,et al.  Food contamination by PCBs and dioxins , 1999, Nature.

[24]  W. Traag,et al.  Residues of dioxins and coplanar PCBS in eggs of free range chickens , 2002 .

[25]  H. Vanderperren,et al.  TEQ-value determinations of animal feed; emphasis on the CALUX bioassay validation. , 2004, Talanta.

[26]  J Baeyens,et al.  The Belgian PCB and dioxin incident of January-June 1999: exposure data and potential impact on health. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  Ronald Hoogerbrugge,et al.  The use of the DR CALUX bioassay and indicator polychlorinated biphenyls for screening of elevated levels of dioxins and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in eel. , 2006, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[28]  E. De Pauw,et al.  Importance of clean-up for comparison of TEQ-values obtained by CALUX and chemo-analysis. , 2004, Talanta.

[29]  Juliette Legler,et al.  Chemical-activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX): a novel in vitro bioassay for Ah receptor active compounds in sediments and pore water. , 1996 .

[30]  E Anklam,et al.  Determination of dioxins (PCDDs/PCDFs) and PCBs in food and feed using the DR CALUX® bioassay: Results of an international validation study , 2005, Food additives and contaminants.

[31]  D. Schrenk,et al.  Natural furocoumarins as inducers and inhibitors of cytochrome P450 1A1 in rat hepatocytes. , 2005, Biochemical pharmacology.

[32]  Safe,et al.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  J. Giesy,et al.  Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals. , 1996, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[34]  M. Denison,et al.  Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals. , 2003, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.